Uh, did nobody watch the video?

One has to wonder if the people who attempt to "illuminate" these "controversial aspects" truly don't recognize that the whole over-the-top caricature is (a) satirical in nature and (b) the entire fucking point of the series. I suspect that they do, and that they're just trying to stir up buzz for page clicks.

Yup. I just can't bring myself to drop $200~400 on a console so I can play the 3 or 4 games that I can't get on a PC. Definitely no point at all in getting a PS3 this late in its life cycle. Maybe I'll jump in early on a PS4...doubtful though...

Old money doesn't buy class either buddy.

It's kinda crazy how Teslas became the new Priuses overnight in LA, huh?

To the richest of the rich, cars are literally disposable. My friend had an M3 back in college and got rear-ended. Instead of getting it repaired, he just got a new one. (It certainly wasn't totaled.) While waiting for delivery, his dad got him an SL500 to drive around for a few months. For the record, he's a…

My wealthy friend's white Louis Vuitton shoes with rainbow logos seem to suggest that there are exceptions to that rule :)

I'm guessing South America.

The center speedometer is the only feature on Minis that I truly disliked.

Muscle Beach is a solid 2 miles south of where this pic was taken. Tipster Michael is an idiot.

Well, that's still too "constant" for me. Now that this has devolved into semantics I'll leave you to your ivory tower. Enjoy the rest of the season.

My definition of constant occurrence would be that it happens at least once every couple of weeks.

Very simple. Instead of a slap on the wrist, make the suspensions substantial. 25 games instead of 5. I'm sure you'll argue that that would be too harsh. We can agree to disagree. As it is, it's clear that the nominal fines and suspensions are doing nothing to dissuade pitchers from doing this; it is a constant…

Ad hominem is a making a personal argument against an opponent instead of addressing the argument itself. "...you really don't strike me as somebody who knows a lot about baseball", followed by nebulous accusations of hyperbole etc qualifies.

That's a rather obtuse conclusion, but you're welcome to think as you please. I suppose that I could similarly conclude that you realize you're pissing in the wind with your arguments because you've resorted to ad hominem.

Out of the last 100 MLB batters who have taken a pitch to the helmet, how many do you think were being targeted? Mine is just a guess, but I think it's a good guess: 0. What's your guess?

I have zero problem with guys throwing high and tight. That is playing the game. It's no different from a hard check at speed or a blindside sack. There is an inherent danger to the play, but it is not an action solely based on the intent to harm. To claim that these instances are "more dangerous" than trying to…

"Codes" and "policing" are all idiotic and you're delusional if you think plunking somehow rises above this.

Actually the analogy is perfectly sound, as the only defense offered up for plunking people seems to be "that's baseball", which is precisely the sentiment that was at work in delaying the institution of protective head gear in the NHL, MLB, NFL, etc.

They are the same people who hate LeBron for being good.