Mezger
Mezger
Mezger

I said “non muscle-car CAR”. Deliberately leaving trucks out of my statement, then I said “They butter their bread on SUVs, Trucks, or commodity fleet cars.”. Inferring that they’re a truck company that also makes mostly mediocre cars, and a few wild ones.

The cost. If i were not a “car guy” I could drive a FWD econobox and not have a car payment spending maybe $15k on something utilitarian. Instead I dropped $20k more on something newer and funner.

The only enthusiast entry level non-muscle-car car MOPAR has made in like 40 years is the SRT-4 Neon. Beyond that it’s been a parade of Stratuses, 200s, and whatever spiritual successor to the K car. They butter their bread on SUVs, Trucks, or commodity fleet cars.

Ha! I think this answers that then.

Regarding Grandma, she’s from a generation that values privacy for even the mundane.

In some model year I’m sure you can find one of these 20 years old or newer for $10k or less.

that would be so much better if they photoshopped out the guy in the rainbow trunks between them.

RWD Mediocrity is a pretty hot take. Nobody serious about drivers cars thinks the Toyobaru twins are mediocre. Also, while they got boxer motors the fuel injection (arguably the biggest source of improvement on the FA) was developed by Toyota that Subaru is now being used in the WRX.

What this really demonstrates is the electric powertrain has fundamentally different wear characteristics from internal combustion. Think about it like this; if your turbo CX-9 had an overboost setting where it could make 700hp, but got like 3mpg without doing damage to the engine, i’m sure it’d make banannas 0-60

Yeah, the RC is basically a platform for modding.

Scion FR-S?

That is also 100% true. Seems like all Subaru head units are just standard double din and not that built in stuff like a lot of other automakers.

Latest refresh added steering wheel controls. I agree to an extent, only because the BRZ radio controls are almost dangerously terrible.

Car looks nice, seems good in concept, but here’s my random flow of consciousness hot take:

Dude, its not just the obstruction they posed, it’s their response to being an obstruction.

In an emergency situation there’s a lot going on, and other options as well. Additionally, in an emergency situation upon the arrival of additional support a larger perimeter would be constructed. These guys had the tools to

You are right, however, being right about a specific statement does not mean that’s the end of it.

Sure, some people were driving too fast for the situation, however the presence of the truck on the road caused a disruption. When the extent of that disruption was known: the Comcast workers had the capability to remedy

The thing is, the Chuck Norris meme is a spinoff of Vin Diesel facts.

Autonomous cars will kill people, this is GOING to happen. They’ll eventually run someone over, smack into another car, or something else.

The real question is, what is obscured when we imagine scenarios like the above is this:
Will autonomous cars be safer than human driven cars?
All available data would seem to

See, so here’s where words matter. MURDER.

Under no circumstances is the described scenario murder. This is at worst manslaughter.

It’s that, plus that first on-ramp shot. Where these cars accelerate and just dump black smoke over all those cars.