Krinke seems like the type of guy who posts "FIRST!!!" on comment boards.

Yup yup yup. The worst part being an INT when that happens is trying to analyze what went wrong, which works for other things, but unfortunately, reading the human mind is impossible.

Oh god. I know that feeling. I was just thinking about it the other day how extroverted guys can talk to girls like it's some kind of Mass Effect dialogue tree while I have to go through conversational dead-ends and awkward silence.

Hahaha that sums up my social interactions. But yeah, small talk. Not a huge fan. It's something I need to work on.

I'd accept in that scenario as well. Heck, I think I'd actually welcome it if I'm that old.

As an INTJ, I agree with absolutely everything you wrote.

Like cancer? If I know my time limit, then as a rational person I would obviously accept.

That's few and far between. My family's medical history pretty damning.

Different strokes for different folks. I'd rather have the recognition while I'm alive than post-humously. Sure, it's selfish, but I'd like to know if my work had an impact for my peace of mind.

That's exactly the way I thought about it. I just don't think 200 days is enough. I'd rather be good at something for a long period of time than to be world class for less than a year.

I'm more of an observer. I'm fascinated by how the world changes (technologically, socially, etc.) and it's one of the things I enjoy as I grow older. But the day I lose control of my mental faculties, it's game over.

That's not even a full year! Give me a chance to bask in my fame!

Would you shorten your life to be really good at something? As in the best in the world? What if you couldn't negotiate and the deal meant you died in 200 days? Would you take it?

I was in my early teens when I first played Majora's Mask and had to resort to walkthroughs for completion's sake. I'm pretty excited and and anxious about replaying it again without any hand-holding.

Close enough.

I agree wholeheartedly. I'd rather have freemium games than something littered with microtransactions (which are often deceptively misleading).

That's true. I've been out of the mobile gaming scene for a while, but I used to play quite a bit on my first-gen iPhone since I didn't have any consoles at the time. The games were actually pretty good before the freemium and pay-to-win models took over.

Thanks for the numbers. I figured they must be pretty obscene for them to be able to spend that much cash on a Super Bowl ad. Somebody really needs to show these casuals Civ or AoE. You could be playing an infinitely better game for the amount you'll end up spending!

All I could think of while seeing the ad was, "Please please please don't let people be dumb enough to fall for this crap (just go buy Civ or AoE!)," and hoping the company goes bankrupt for this absurdly expensive ad campaign.

Holograms and AI can't come soon enough cos I'd love to have Marshawn Lynch's commentary and presence while playing video games.