The technical difference has to do with the speed of the reaction. If the speed of the reaction is supersonic, then it’s an “explosion”. Otherwise, it’s combustion.
The technical difference has to do with the speed of the reaction. If the speed of the reaction is supersonic, then it’s an “explosion”. Otherwise, it’s combustion.
Maybe not “explosions” exactly, but definitely “burning and expanding fuel”.
That’s a low-hanging-fruit comment you just plucked...
Riiiiight. Ahm, I have a...thing.
*walks away quickly*
...You’re interesting, I’ll give you that. But you’re really not that great at making arguments that make sense.
...Who the hell are you quoting?
Spamming the same argument tirelessly is not a very good technique.
COTD!
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.…
Real life does not have a One Steve/Jim Limit.
On one hand: Funky little French wagon.
OTOH: Florida.
I’d call this a very, incredibly hesitant and incredibly mild Crack Pipe.
I wouldn’t call it “bad” so much as “weird”.
COTD?
Rams are extra-blocky, is what I’m saying. Big boxes with gigantic engine intakes and very little off-roading capability or visibility from the inside.
...and I’m just sitting here, keeping a flame for Tacomas everywhere. Never liked Tundras much because they’re just too big and blocky (like the Ram).
I can’t help but feel that the charge/fuel gauge can be improved by overlapping them somehow, or by shoving them into the same area...
Fitting that the next self-driving car will be one nobody would want to be caught dead driving.
Given the very thin band between the hood/beltline and the roof, I can only assume this model will have cameras all over the outside and displays all over the inside just so you can see where you’re going.
The Model 3 doesn’t need to be profitable, it just needs to be cheap enough that people will buy into electric cars more, perhaps Tesla cars specifically. It’s not the car that will cause Tesla stocks to skyrocket, it’s a bigger foot in the door than the S or the X have been.
I think it was something like “Give me a lever long enough, and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I can move the world”.
I have no clue how your comment deals with the point my comment made, but ‘k. You obviously did your research.
BTW: An actual “quantum leap” is really, really minuscule, and it bugs me when people use it to describe something huge.