You, I like.
You, I like.
That too.
Maybe if you’d read the article, you would have noticed that the issue was the method of measuring.
Hint: There was no radar/laser use.
People still have to fix wrecked cars.
It’s generally a bad idea to compromise safety, though.
Who gives a fuck about style when it ruins your contact patch!? The fact that we even have nice, wide tires today is the difference between staying on the road and skidding off it when conditions aren’t perfect.
My pity. Congratulations.
Nah, stance just has no place on a performance-oriented car.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Fixing problems requires expertise, organization, and legitimate effort. Not many have that for one reason or another.
Hot rods were generally faster than their stock counterparts; stance has no place amongst performance mods.
That comment was about a year and a half old. In any case, that’s not a small amount of money to spend on a car, so of course there should be some expectation of quality molding.
Why!? Why would you ever post that last one!?
...I dunno, I’d take it.
Actually, I heard Massholes are actually a result of the roads being built on cow paths. Cows are generally not known for being good traffic planners.
*shrug* Have never worn high-heels (or platform shoes, for that matter), so I can’t really speak from experience.
Seems like a bad idea to encourage distracted driving, but the high-heel thing sounds doable. Just add indents to the floor, or change the way the pedals hinge.
It just looks like a standard subcompact with a million rebranded features everyone takes for granted.
I definitely wouldn’t want to sit in that if it’s been left out in the sun. Otherwise, instant (L) burn on the middle of your back.
No, because it is an objectively horrible position.