Mastiff-
Mastiff
Mastiff-

Really, dude? “Troll” on this site usually refers to the burner accounts who spam threads with racial slurs, photos of mutilated cats, dead infants, and gore/torture photos of murder victims. Or just photos of Hitler. It’s not like some blood-sucking billionaire hasn’t made it clear that he’s spending millions of

you didn’t click through to read those articles did you? because one takes a handful of anecdotes that are almost all instances of clerical errors or mistakes involving generic sounding names of some dead people, and calls them “potential” fraud in a city with millions of legit votes cast over the decades.

Leave the oil. Take the cannoli.

Jesus fuck. This is the longest SNL cold open ever.

What? Again, I don’t know what you’re talking about. This is not about stealing jokes. You called her a hack. I said I was turned off by that. Now you want me to go searching the internet for some evidence to disprove some vague accusation you made of which I am not familiar? That is very fucking weird.

Again, you transparently have no idea what constitutes that particular logical fallacy so you should probably stop saying it so often. I mean, assuming you care about embarrassing yourself in public; maybe you don’t. Your contributions to this conversation so far make me wonder.

You came into a thread talking about how Amy Schemer handles hecklers well, and started saying she sucks as a comic and hey Maria Bamford. This isn’t an “argument” that people want to engage with you in, because its completely out of left field, it’s a dumb argument because all it is is opinions and of course we’re

“Well, she’s kinda a hack.” So, you start with an ad feminem argument, and....

1) Obama has a functional FEMA who was on the ground quickly, whereas Bush did not. 2) The governor did not specifically ask Bush not to come - quite the opposite in fact. 3) The flooding during Katrina was not as widespread and getting a President into the city would not have shut down supply lines like it would for

Nice try revising history. The problem with Bush was not that he “didn’t go to New Orleans right away.”

That’s because he doesn’t want you to suck his dick, Neil.

Im pretty sure youre trolling.

Yeah, but a gun is a fast, easy spur of the moment way to do it. No planning.

Utter bullshit. My sister was around all sorts of methods like knives for years. It wasn’t until an uncle, unaware of her mental illness, gave her a gun that she successfully committed suicide. That idea of a moment of shocking obliteration draws them. That it completely obliterates them means it will work, unlike

One can reasonably conclude anything one wants, but one would be better served by examining the research, so as to not just be making shit up:

I never said guns made them do these things*. That’s silly. I could sit in a room with a gun forever and not kill anyone/accidently shoot myself. The point was, many people proudly, repeatedly declare themselves “responsible gun owners,” and most of the people they point to to make this distinction (this woman, my

That is not true. Limiting access to guns will affect those who have a short-term down turn by removing a method with a high perceived level of certainty and short planning stage, much like limiting access to lethal drugs does.

Can you conservative fuck face trolls stop using this shit as the go-to insult? It is so damn unoriginal and is actual nonsense. I’m sorry that you Republicans don’t have any funny and intelligent late night political commentary shows, and I’m sorry that John Oliver did a brilliant segment that called out pathetic

Welcome to every doctor who knows that vaccines don’t cause Autism versus every Facebook member who saw Jenny McCarthy say it doesn’t.

I blame the internet, and mostly youtube. It basically created a generation that gives zero fucks about IP and copyright law, throws in that they totally misunderstood the law with stances like "We aren't making money so it's ok." and using fair use claims without understanding the criteria.