Or like listened to Hillary who said it long before anyone else.

It’s part of an overall dislike of the costume redesign they did for the New 52 where his costume looks more and more like either armor or a super-rigid onesie. An armored Superman seems inherently wrong for the character to me. The red briefs are also borrowed from what seems to have inspired the original look of the…

I would mock this but I got in a near-screaming argument the other day about the importance of Superman’s red briefs returning to the costume so I have no room to mock.

Oh wow I feel your pain. :/ We had a couple of Hispanic, a Polynesian, and a Native American officer and people would flat out refuse to talk to them (or call us to complain that we’d sent “one of those damn Mexicans” to their house).

In a former life, I used to work 911 dispatch for ‘good ol’ Sherrif Joe Arpaio’ and OMFG I hated these calls. I would get about 15 a week and the breakdown was typically 80% Hispanic 15% black and 5% unsure.

“Calling the police is the epitome of escalation, and calling the police on black people for noncrimes is a step away from asking for a tax-funded beatdown, if not an execution.”

Because they shouldn’t have had to since no one else was asked to. How is this hard? I believed a witness originally stated they weren’t approached by staff. If I got that wrong, my fault. Still does not explain or excuse why you want to defend this corporation’s obviously discriminatory behavior.

Starbucks founder Howard Schultz, in fact, was a big proponent of building a comfortable third place for people to work and socialize. (The first two places being home and the traditional office.) It’s part of the company’s mission.

You don’t have to buy anything to sit in a Starbucks. It’s literally on the front of every door of every Starbucks.

Starbucks doesn’t have that rule. Managers cannot make up rules that do not exists at the stores they are employed.

It’s not “a life”, much less a “kid”, without a brainstem, Einstein.

Yeah am I advocating the murder of a person who can live on their own and not in my body? No? Shut the fuck up then you women controlling douche bag

It’s the woman’s body that’s hosting that parasite, so why does anyone else get a say?

If my wife is pregnant, the only opinions on abortion I want to hear are hers.

“I believe my readers deserve to hear from someone who’s wrong and has a million other platforms on which to be loudly wrong.”

It’s even more galling when you note that while there seems to be little shortage of idiots suggesting that conservatives deserve to be on progressive media platforms, you won’t see the same reciprocated by conservative media platforms, except as “gotcha” set-ups meant to denigrate and discredit leftist positions for…

Note, too, that this only happens w/ “liberal” outlets. You have and will never hear of a “conservative” paper lending their op-ed pages to a far-left hippie (let alone multiple) who longs for actual socialism.

What the fuck is up with this whole, “We need to be a big house and invite in all the people who spew shit our readers disagree with” that seems to be taking over print media?

Not sure if that’s worse than what the DailyMail did, they just posted the photo of a girl because “she shows up in many photos with him on facebook” saying that it MIGHT be the girlfriend that broke up with him, but couldn’t confirm that...Then why the fuck are you posting the photo?