Ironic that this was a NYT article. The same news outlet that Glenn Thrush worked for. Hillary eventually got rid of Strider. The NYT cannot say the same. As I said, deflection.

Yes, Hillary Clinton and Charles Manson. Exactly the same person. Great example!

You vote for the one who would best serve the country ARE YOU FUCKING CRAZY VOTE FOR HER AND FIRE HIM INTO THE FUCKING SUN FOR FUCK’S FUCKING SAKE

No, the problem is that you should be thinking “this policy is good” or “this policy is not good.” For example, building a massive jobs and infrastructure plan around powering all American homes with renewable energy>IDK, something with coal MAGA.

I do believe that VIRTUAL BRIT said it - she’s married to someone who is known to be a sexual harasser. The idea that she would be capable of something like this and that it is news is laughable.

I’m getting at the fact voting for someone who wanted to pass the ERA over someone who wanted to arrest women for abortions shouldn’t be hard.

Ken Starr was so desperate to nail Bill that he ended his 70 million dollar, 7 yr Crusade with a consensual affair with an adult intern. If there was even an iota of credibility to her claim he would’ve used her. Not because he cares about women, he doesn’t. Starr is a piece of shit, and the rape scandal at Baylor…

“What about Hillary?” is always the answer.

Yes, but if you break that down it turns into “she shook my hand and made a generic platitude at a fundraiser.

I absolutely love and admire Hillary Clinton. I don’t regret supporting her for a second, both in ‘08 and ‘16. But I’d say her biggest weakness has been some of the people around her and her unwillingness to cut them from her political life when they are an obvious liability (i.e. Mark Penn, Sydney Blumenthal, Huma…

You claim she deserved to lose against a racist sexual predator. That’s not the basis of discussion.

Really? You prefer a man who has sexually harassed dozens of women, bragged about it and barely has any women in his cabinet? Not to mention the whole destroying American democracy and our reputation around the world.

The difference from Ivana though is the incentive to lie. Ivana presumably wouldn’t want to falsely accuse the father of her children of rape, especially when she was trying to arrive at a divorce settlement with a notoriously vindictive litigant like Trump. Broadrick, on the other hand was on the GOP payroll, and is…

In what twisted fucking world is that worse than actually being a sexual predator?

Dude. There are GOP politicians who openly espouse Family Values while actively cheating on their own wives.

Absolutely. Gotta have the rapist in chief lead the country instead.

The GOP suffers absolutely no consequences for being hypocrites so why wouldn’t they

Bull shit she deserved to lose against an actual sexual predator. That’s fucking ridiculous.

Oh you know they gonna point it out... hypocrisy means nothing to them.

Cult of Bernie is dancing in the streets over at Splinter...