MarcusMaximus
MarcusMaximus
MarcusMaximus

Ya, I don't actually really play multiplayer games... pretty much ever. More of a single-player guy since I play mostly for story and meaning. As such I've touched MW2 once for about 5 minutes but that's about it.

How 'bout one with anti-unlocks? You start off with access to the whole load-out, and then as you progress, the best weapons and equipment get stripped from you.

Problem: People tend to get better as they play more. This system also gives better weapons and gear as people play more. That means that not only will people with more advanced equipment be at an advantage because of the better equipment, they'll be at even *more* of an advantage because they've had more practice

The problem I have is the same one I've said here before: If you have to sell cheats to your game to make it fun, then you're game isn't good enough to be made in the first place.

"They *re-posted a ton of her personal details."

"Yet, the thread was clearly violating this schoolgirl's privacy in perhaps a far more probing and even frightening way."

Eh, it depends. A lot of the area surrounding Vivec is beautiful, as are the cities in eastern Vvardenfell. If you go anywhere near Red Mountain, or to the valleys that lead to it, you're right that it's fairly ugly. Which makes sense, since they're constantly covered in ash storms.

I'm confused. When I was (briefly) in ROTC, we were told that one of the differences between the M16 and M4 was that the M4 did away with the automatic fire that's standard on the M16. Wikipedia also appears to back up this view, since it lists semi-auto, 3-round burst and automatic fire as standard features of the

In fairness here, I've not seen or heard of one person saying they enjoyed uncharted for the Vita, whether it be critics, commenters online, or friends who bought the game. They've all said it was a horrible, stripped down version of the console one. Which is pretty much the same as I've heard about every other game

Well, in fairness, the 360 is also Microsoft's most shiny, least outdated console. They don't have anything else(unless you count the XBox but I'm doubtful more original xbox's sold than Wii U's).

"Art may be made with a paintbrush or selected as a ready-made, but it has to be an act of personal imagination."

It is kinda reminiscent of Peter Molyneux's claims of the past, though Blow *has* shown commitment to actually following through on things he believes important.

I think the real difference with the Wii U is that "U" in no way implies superiority. "Super" obviously does, and 360 provides a number that implies superiority as well. Heck, even 3DS implies superiority, though it likely puts too much focus on the glasses free 3d aspect(which is obviously what they were pushing at

In this case I left it at the default. For Humble Bundle V, it was all to the devs though, since I'm an independent developer myself.

They managed just fine with the Super Nintendo.

Reading through, everything suddenly became clear when it got to the cheating part(on both parties). Of course you were living separate lives and never really paid attention to each other, you were both carrying on far more important(to you) relationships with other people. This isn't so much a judgment of you(or

Personally, I absolutely loved the story of Super Paper Mario. Honestly, I wasn't expecting anything there when I first picked it up, but it was a startlingly deep and interesting story, which made the game roughly tied with Bioshock in my eyes at the time.

"With regard to the story, we did a survey over the Super Paper Mario24 game in Club Nintendo25, and not even 1% said the story was interesting"

I haven't seen *kotaku* say that it doesn't have any games(could have been articles saying that, but I've missed them). What I have seen is a ton of *commenters* saying they're frustrated by a lack of (quality) games for the Vita, most complaints being that games are stripped down copies of full PS3 games, resulting

sarcasm.