We finally find out the REAL reason they bought Star Wars.

When developers say things like this it always makes me lean away from them.

Very much. The problem isn't with the amount of interesting villains in Superman comics. The problem is they keep using the same two boring ones in the live action movies. It's just getting so repetitive that Luthor's plans all involve real estate, and if Zod is in one he will die. I haven't even seen the movie and…

Where are the petunias?

Now all I need is a little Gordon Freeman to give this to.

What?! Google can't even put Atlantis in the right spot.

Everyone knows flame stickers make it go faster.

Are you a whale biologist?

This is beautiful in it's own way. The eyes seem to capture a sort of lonely sadness.

"Finally, someone who understands me"

How come so many people seem to forget or deny that Superman has killed in the past?

He's not naked. He's wearing a watch.

What, no plants in the ocean?

It's to bad that in nearly 80 years of comics that they have only created 2 villains, Zod and Luther. If it had more of a history, they might be able to use more than TWO DAMN VILLAINS IN THIRTY YEARS OF SUPERMAN MOVIES! At this point I would be thrilled to see a Superman movie with the Toyman.

Not very popular at Mardi Gras, was she.

...And none of that was on the page you linked to. The fact that it is a "word" that was deliberately misspelled by advertisers 90 years ago and again in the 70's to sell a toy (both words in the name misspelled) does nothing to justify your English major diploma.

Totally missed opportunity, he should have been played by Dan Aykroyd.

Your link to the word bright does not show the "word" "brite" anywhere on the page. Suck it up. It was a typo.

"Damn! All that work and there's nothing here but thousands of copies of the original cut of 'Star Wars' and Fabergé eggs. What a waste of time."

Is there nothing more important to look for from history than a missing "a"?