Absolutely! And don’t date or, if it’s too late, dump assholes who would pull this kind of shit, either.

Let’s hope it was fake. However, the fact that someone would even think that would be funny... It hurts just to think about it...

No she doesn’t... Being dumb is not a crime. Hurting someone on purpose is.

Yes, exactly this! Anything painful involving a dick is considered extra-extra-extra-extra-horrible, but vaginas are fair game because... Women don’t feel pain, or something? Hurting women is hilarious? Painful infections and chemical burns are funny?

Perhaps if they tend to be clutterminded and think they have opened it themselves?

That’s not a prank, that’s fucking assault... Ah yes, hurting women is hilarious, according to douchebros on the internet...

But there’s this confidentiality thing. I’m not sure what it’s like in the USA but here in Belgium medical information is always kept private. It’s like one of the highest ethical things regarding doctors. Well, my explanation is horrible because it’s the middle of the night, for which I apologise, but perhaps you get…

It’s still that way today, unfortunately. There is some progress but it’s minimal.

What the actual fuck...

For some reason I can’t star anything so have this instead. :)

At uni I’m currently following a course on the development of English and one of the first Old English texts we read is one long insult. It included the phrase “may you always have shit in your beard”, which I believe fits gloriously in our wishes for these assholes.

Even with constant disclaimers, some guys keep on trying and trying and trying. Or, even worse, some guys keep on doing stuff that I’m not sure is an actual attempt, so I get to choose between turning them down and having them get confused or mad because they didn’t mean it that way, or I ignore it and then they see…

I can imagine that. I’m reading it so you don’t have to, if you wish. (As in, feel free to ask questions about it and everything)

I’ve started reading it yesterday and he specifically seeks out prepubescent girls; as soon as they start to develop he finds them too old. The age range starts at 9, if I’m not mistaken, and only goes up to 14 in the case of late bloomers. Also, that is one hard book to get through...

I don’t know how to handle this because of my lack of social skills, but please, hear me out on this. I know I don’t know you and I might be intruding, but I beg of you to try to keep an open mind and read what I will try to explain. The Japanese fashion called lolita (usually referred to as “lolita fashion” to avoid…

Isn’t Lolita prepubescent? I believe he specifically mentions her lack of bodily development, though I may be mistaken (lack of sleep and the like usually don’t really help my memory).

If you are, of course, talking about the subculture where people actually idolise and want to look like Lolita, if I’m not mistaken the name is nymphet or something along those lines. I’m not sure how safe googling that is as I haven’t done it myself out of fear for what I might come across.

I assume by “Lolita subculture” you mean the Japanese street fashion, so I just want to say that there is no link between the book and the fashion, or if there is (I recently found a translation from an old interview with one of the old designers, but pretty much everyone has a different opinion on it and I can’t seem…

As a linguist, I wish I could star this more than once.

I don’t get it, what was his problem with the present? Apart from that, he seems like an ungrateful asshole. Good job on breaking up with him.