Now you're going a bit too far. It is a fact that male rape victims are usually not taken seriously as a result of the patriarchic idea that men want sex all the time. Unfortunately there are both men and women who think this way, so...
Now you're going a bit too far. It is a fact that male rape victims are usually not taken seriously as a result of the patriarchic idea that men want sex all the time. Unfortunately there are both men and women who think this way, so...
The thing is, it wouldn't even surprise me anymore if it was real, that's how fucked up things are...
Is that real? I mean, I shouldn't be surprised, but holy fuck that's gross. Poor young boys :/
That's not how I interpreted it. I thought it was about how wrong it is to try children as adults, but maybe that's just my naivety. That's definitely possible, and if that's how s/he meant it then obviously I don't agree.
So this person who claims you shouldn't read things that aren't for your age group writes tweets which look like they come from a teenager. Good job in making me take you seriously, Graham!
Oh, alright, I get it. Just one more question, does that mean that a four year old, for example, could also be tried as an adult provided they commit one of the crimes on the list, or is there a minimum age?
You're right, that definitely doesn't make sense. Even less when they don't try rapists and the like as adults (not saying rape is as bad as murder, but it's probably in the top 5 of worst crimes so). This whole thing is just so damn confusing.
That does sound likely. And it's indeed a fucked up system, unfortunately.
You've definitely got a point there. That's why I think it's wrong to treat any child as older than their age, no matter what the case is. It's way too much of a slippery slope...
He groped her breast, let's not forget that.
If these girls (12 years old :o) would be tried as adults, can they just follow that trend for 17-year old rapists and the like? Please?
Oh, I'm sorry then. :)
You do know that LittleThoughts was quoting someone else, not stating their own opinion, right? They specifically called the woman from the quote an asshole. That is not agreeing, rather the opposite...
You do know that LittleThoughts was quoting someone else, not stating their own opinion, right? They specifically called the woman from the quote an asshole. That is not agreeing, rather the opposite...
You do know that LittleThoughts was quoting someone else, not stating their own opinion, right? They specifically called the woman from the quote an asshole. That is not agreeing, rather the opposite...
You do know that LittleThoughts was quoting someone else, not stating their own opinion, right? They specifically called the woman from the quote an asshole. That is not agreeing, rather the opposite...
You do know that LittleThoughts was quoting someone else, not stating their own opinion, right? They specifically called the woman from the quote an asshole. That is not agreeing, rather the opposite...
You do know that LittleThoughts was quoting someone else, not stating their own opinion, right? They specifically called the woman from the quote an asshole. That is not agreeing, rather the opposite...
You do know that LittleThoughts was quoting someone else, not stating their own opinion, right? They specifically called the women from the quote an asshole. That is not agreeing, rather the opposite...
You do know that LittleThoughts was quoting someone else, not stating their own opinion, right? They specifically called the women from the quote an asshole. That is not agreeing, rather the opposite...