I mean, that’s not great service, and it’s not a great experience for you. That sucks and I’m not trying to take that away. But it’s not quite on the level of almost poisoning a group of people or shouting about a “KID BLOW-JOB” or even the tuna sub story as far as creative or unusual ways to screw up.

Also, note that for this subject in particular, the employee really has to have screwed up in a unique and interesting way for anyone to have a reason to care about the story. If you specifically requested a sandwich with no mayo, and a server then brought you a sandwich with mayo on it, well, I’m very sad for you,…

This is exactly the type of story the author said he didn’t want submitted at the end of the article.

Cool story, bro

You... spend $60 a month on food?

Maybe, maybe not.

Never go in against a nurse, Joy.

“Who knew the nurses of America moved like the mob?”

I agree. Dressing her daughter to match her, complete with a black band across her chest, was absolutely sexualizing the child. If she has been topless at the beach, or splashing around a fountain, cool. But as an assistant desnuda is just gross.

Thank you for writing what I was feeling. Of course a nude bebe is not sexual, and its cute, but this is her mom’s work, which is sexualized, thus, not suitable for a toddler. For example, if a mother who is a stripper brings here baby/toddler to the club and lets her come out on stage in a similar outfit. no. If she…

this is mom parading her naked toddler around tourists for tips. That's fucking gross. This was not a political statement. This was straight "come with mommy, men will give us tips for being naked" — who wants to take random pics with a naked toddler man??? Come on!

It doesn’t look like this was to make an artistic statement this looks like it was to make money for posing partially nude with STRANGERS. Even if it was to make a statement is it right to do this with a toddler? Where random people can touch them or take photos of them to do God knows what with? Why not use a doll to…

For me, it’s more the painted toddler chest mirroring the one of her mom. I’m not judging the desnudas as well, but this is clearly a sexual context, so allowing that little one to mimic her mom’s outfit is wrong.

The black bar over the little girl’s chest is what did it in for me. That mother is clearly sexualizing her child.

Ditto.

It was the tape over the baby’s nipples for me. It kind of shows that this isn't just some sweet children playing with the sun on their chests, not a care in the world. I don't think the woman is necessarily a bad woman or mother, but sometime a adult hobbies are just good old fashioned adult hobbies.

Yeah, I’m finding it very hard to get the slightest bit upset with the NY Post here, which is a new feeling for me. Like, yes, their campaign against the desnudas is terrible. But a fucking toddler had her nipples painted over and was put topless in a frilly dress next to her mom, who was selling a sex-adjacent…

“And I also respect the mom hopefully trying to instill a value of body autonomy to the tot.”

Yeah this one is weird. Objectively, no a toddler being topless is not a sexual thing at all, but in the context of this whole thing where these women are certainly being sexualized it is weird.