So no screens of the mysterious notepad stuff? And possibly more game to explore? I’m calling possible shenanigans on Jamie. I think his reporting of this could just be his own performance art.
So no screens of the mysterious notepad stuff? And possibly more game to explore? I’m calling possible shenanigans on Jamie. I think his reporting of this could just be his own performance art.
Thing is, the argument about the government deciding what goes into someone’s body? I totally get that, and agree. I used to lean pretty libertarian, and some that sentiment just won’t go away. I’d be on board with that rhetoric entirely if non-vaccination didn’t affect the health of others. Your body, your right,…
The “responsible/conscious” aspects are entirely branding and advertising. Organic food as defined by the USDA classification is in no way more responsible or environmentally conscious than non-organic food.
I think the point is to dissolve the illusion that organic food customers are somehow sticking it to the larger companies by buying organic products.
Define these farming practices you’ve posted about several times. Please, within the confines of the USDA classification and outside of the idealism present in the marketing, explain how they are in any way better for the consumer.
You’re halfway there. Organic food is in no way better for you. From the (admittedly cursory) reading I’ve done, many modern pesticides are indeed not permitted under the certification. Since pesticide-free commercial farming isn't viable, organic farmers use more archaic, less safe pesticides.
Organic food is a scam. I buy organic food only when non-organic food isn't an alternative. That's becoming less frequent as tge guidelines for organic food become more permissive and inclusive.
Charlie is quoted to reveal, “AAAAAAAAAAUUUUUUGGGGHHHH” (in a human-like raised voice)
Pee? More like salty golden health in liquid form!
Agreed, delving into any kind of discussion regarding autism in relation to vaccines needs to stop. They are entirely unrelated, and discussing one should not trigger a discussion of the other, ever. There is no link. Period.
As someone who works in entertainment, I think everyone is really over-analyzing the Game of Thrones byte. This is classic Hollywood talk, and likely means very little about where the show is headed. The formula in this case is 'Family friendly (insert most popular TV show with swords right now)'
Just came a little. More please, I need to finish.
Giant pig Ganon or GTFO
It's a little hard to take your jabs at Microsoft seriously when they're sitting directly above a paid Sony promo ;)
Wow this thing sounds awful.
I live in Portland, Oregon. It's awful here with the gluten trend (and unless you have a gluten allergy or a gluten-related disease like a friend of mine, it IS a bullshit diet trend). I'll bet you a slice of white bread that happened here in P-town. "Animal carcasses?!" I seriously can't keep quiet around idiots…
I agree, without true access to the firsthand experience of daily objectification, I think empathy and a desire to understand can be a worthy substitute.
I'm genetically pretty slim, but years ago when I had an embrinal tumor (didn't know at the time), it pumped my body full of weight-gain hormones, and I actually got pretty chubby for a year until the docs found it and began chemo (the ultimate diet).
Thanks for taking the time to respond with all of this, I was indeed unaware of many of these points! I do appreciate the efforts of the Gawker media staff as a whole as it's become my primary source for pop culture news and online discussion.
That's a fair point. I still would rather have the opportunity to respond as part of the discussion as a whole (even if my response were to be "not cool man"). I've seen other comments here that are just as inappropriate as those described to be moderated that have been left up for response— however none with 54…