Ludikhris
Ludikhris
Ludikhris

You pay for XBOX Live, which then allows MS to pay developers for exclusive rights to DLC type content. It's one of the primary reasons why the 360 has so many more timed exclusive content. They've admitted it in the past but put it as "We give you early access to content, so you should pay us $$$" When in fact you

And this is why we pay for Xbox Live.

Dragons...

What an excellent video. Thank you so much for sharing that. If you're reading this and haven't watched the video Verno77 linked yet, do, it's well thought out and informative.

Looking forward to hardware rev 2.0. Everyone else please go buy one, so that rev 2.0 actually exists. It has been my experience though the rev2.0 is the optimal time to buy with a steady amount of games out there, and a more refined feature set. Subsequent revs don't usually add anything of value, at least with

I always think about this when playing final fantasy games. "Yeah, so that's not functional. Dude you're gonna die for not knowing how to dress."

Then I have to agree with you.

I did go back and read through the whole thing, but honestly I didn't see new arguments from previous articles.

I concede that my metaphor was poor and showed a correlation/causation issue.

I went back to read through it before I posted that last comment. Nothing new in this article from the last few. I congratulate you for wasting my time, but I won't let you waste anymore. I stand by my assertion that you aren't thinking about what you're reading, you're simply reading and regurgitating it without

You are either arguing that nerds don't like boobs, or that game devs don't put boobs in games because they like them, and know that the mass audience likes them.

I feel sorry for your lack of thought. So so sad.... Just read the news and repeat, no original thoughts to be had. Sorry dude.

Well seriously... it's just like sugar is in cupcakes cause that's what fat kids like. Do we need to take out sugar if the diabetic people all get together and say "we want cupcake equality!" no. That's dumb. We make a niche group of Splenda cupcakes for diabetic people and everyone wins.

I read maybe the first paragraph of this one. Is this topic not old yet? Must we beat the living shit out of it until we're all bleeding from the mouth.

Why? Take down the seller, he's the one with 25k.

Why say 20 years ago? It's now over 25 years ago. Sure the statement is correct, but it would have been if you said "the same state that retailers received it more than 3 years ago"

Now playing

I feel bad too for self censoring. See at work I really want to dress like Flavor Flav, but unfortunately I will get treated horribly for this. You and me are both oppressed for who we are.

Maybe.

Narrated by a young Ben Stein.

This is their interpretation of the laws, not the law itself. There is no precedent for conviction of downloading games you own personally. Nintendo is just pointing out their beliefs and basically that if they catch you doing it, they may try to use you to set that precedent.