LoverOfAllThingsFast
LoverOfAllThingsFast
LoverOfAllThingsFast

You really don't have to be a douche-tastic asshole to everyone you reply to. There are ways to make your point without trying to belittle people. I'm also not a child. Dyno pulls may not be the most accurate, but they are probably the most readily available and what everyone knows. There a million different factors

They just released a video review on the Hellcat and they report 660+ rwhp from dyno pulls.

The answer is 911. Because backseats. lol

The answer: A 1995 Porsche 911 (993)

Why? Is it all of a sudden not a GT3 anymore cause it has a sunroof? Its not a "pure" sportcars anymore? Idk, I prefer to have sunroofs, but i laugh whenever i hear people talk bad about them on sportcars as if they can actually feel and tell the difference in structural rigidity or as if it really matters when you

I get it, we shouldn't say "chick cars" because in some ways that is demeaning and saying they are inferior or something like that. However, it would be stupid for us to say that there are not certain cars out there who's demographic was women from the beginning to the end of the design and conception. The Nissan

I swear on my life if Mazda made this for around 25k, I would buy it. Instantly. this would be the the perfect car for me.

thats exactly what i was going to say. the 991 truly took the 911 into the GT category more so than sportscar. the shear size a width of it, i honestly didnt expect the 997 to look so small.

Washington, DC...duh obvious answer

Oh ok, I was confused with the measurements or rather how they measure. It just seems Lambo could solve their understeering problems by making the rear track wider. Imean, they are already fighting an awd system (even though Audi's system is the R8 allows for plenty of oversteer with enough throttle).

thats interesting. so wider front track for front axle grip, and then wider rear tires?

Maybe normal cars, but I just thought most performance cars, especially rear and awd, had wider rear track.

That obviously isn't true when you have cars like the 991 GT3.

Just making sure i'm not crazy, did he say that the front track is wider than the rear?!

Well, thank you for taking the time to respond twice with your condescending tone. You just told me nothing that i didn't already know and IMO, which this is all just my opinion, my point still stands. With the P1, the aerodynamic advances they made are virtually priceless. For you to tell me I'm not informed and

And the crazy part is that it is actually smaller than the Enzo. How bad (or blind) of a designer/engineer do you have to be to make this car look this bad. I never really thought the Enzo was a looker, but goodness, they managed to make the LaFerrari much uglier.

I think the LaFerrari is dingleberry, dirty asshole ugly. The overhang in front of the front wheels is atrocious. It manages to actually look too wide. And those headlights straight from a 458...yuck. But the worst part for me is the fact that it is nothing new. They took longer than Porsche and Mclaren to make this

Icon Bronco or unimog doka

Singer 911 or Lamborghini Egoista

I'm American and I still don't get it.