It is great, but I have to pipe up about Bobbi Gibb and her ninja stylings that paved the way for that openness. She dressed in baggy sweats and a hoodie, and jumped into the throng from the bushes so she wouldn’t be discovered. (She had tried to register but was told she couldn’t handle it.) 

All female runners do. That is what allows women like Paula Radcliff to have children after running a marathon.

HAH, women’s ski jumping wasn’t added until 2014 and the head of the International Ski Federation had the SAME REASON it shouldn’t be allowed. That landing would cause a woman’s baby-making facilities to just plumb drop out.

I was listening to her on NPR on Sunday. Her boyfriend came along and hip checked one of the guys so that she could break free and continue to run.

He’s not attacking her. He’s obviously tripping over her uteri.

Deadspin proves that those men still exist and think that even when women have their own sports organizations they’re still useless and unnecessary and an affront to their respective sports.

1967, male sports officials believed the strain of long distance running “would cause women’s uteri to fall out or that they would become musclebound and grow hair on their chests.

In the middle of the race, Semple tried to shove Switzer and physically pull her out. “He was pulling at me and screaming, ‘Get the hell out of my race and give me that number,’” Switzer told Deadspin in 2015. “Arnie was screaming at Jock, and then Tom smashed Jock out of the way.”

Do ‘conservative’ papers ever hire liberals for ‘balance’? I sorta think they don’t, and nobody ever thinks that should be redressed. It’s only the papers people think of as liberal that wingnut have to be courted.

The clever deniers have shifted their argument under cover of “skepticism,” the same way anti-vaxxers don’t outright say vaccines cause autism anymore, just that we shouldn’t blindly trust the FDA. It’s all dog whistle bullshit, and the NYT shouldn’t be promoting it.

I considered a NYT subscription as some sort of act of faith in “real journalism” but their opinion pieces have always been such a fucking shit show I couldn’t bring myself to do it.
I (like many racist uncles) get my information primarily from the internets, but is there some subscription service for news worth…

It is always fascinating to consider that the WSJ actually does some respectable journalism, but then they couple it to one of the worst editorial pages out there.

Anecdotal, but I’ve never been on a date with anyone more boring and vapid than a tall, well built 30-something guy who worked in finance. He was so boring I wanted to cry. I’m young-ish but not a super hot model, so clearly I wasn’t the problem.

Ok but the article did give us this amazing image.

That one’s supposedly average boyfriend was also the best looking of the men in the article.

The hot one, obviously

I treat hot women similarly. When walking down the street, I refuse to make eye contact with them, even though I can tell its what they truly desire. Sure, they may be looking into the window of Lord & Tay, but they’re really trying to read my essence. My essence is hot. But I won’t give them the chance to glimpse my…

Oh my god, that article. The most hilarious thing is that in the pictures of these supposed heartbreakers and the average partners they’ve passed up models for, it’s completely impossible to tell which one is which.