But, but, but!

CDC is a liar organization. They just labeled men FORCED TO SEX as not victims of rape, just because. And you won't address that? Maybe I will find my own organization which will amend the definition of rape to explicitly exclude females forced to sex, as CDC did with the men, and then publish my great and mighty…

"Even if you include made to penetrate as rape and not sexual assault you still don't have 40% of rapes done by women."

"Made to penetrate" is forced sex. That is rape.

You mean you can't comprehend a million?

Oh please. I explicitly said about the situation when the wife of a girlfriend INITIATES a sexual encounter while being in a bed with a man, giving non-verbal cues that she wants sex, and how I think that IN THIS PARTICULAR SITUATION a man doesn't have to explicitly ask "do you want sex?", when she is, pardon my…

And, based on the fact that I was called a rapist on various social media through the last year a few times, based on ONLY the fact that I dared to enter discussions about the exact form of consent and suggested that under certain circumstances (i.e. a wife or a girl willingly engaging in a sexual action beforehand)…

Yes, because a voice against mob justice is somehow trolling and being mad. It doesn't really matter WHO is subjected to mob justice and lynching - it is always wrong. Maybe because mobs are driven by hatred, emotion and lack of logic. If you only look at lynchings trough the lenses of "persecution" and "privilege",…

Does it come on top? When people accused of rape can be put in prison (and raped there), lynched (and killed) etc.?

I actually think a false rape accusation is WORSE than rape, for a number of reasons.

So the weight of punishment should be proportional to the number of criminals, and not the severity of the deed?

When will Jezebel support lynchings of KNOWN false rape accusers?

A million of rape victims are a strawman for you?

Yes. I could put all of my ex-girlfriends in jail for 14 years that way.

Dead white men are a cause of celebration for many feminists. And even if 99.99% of men in Ukraine are white, and about 50% of Ukrainian people are men, this does not give pause to such thinking.

But they were men - and Jezebel doesn't care for men, even if they were stabbed or shot at. So Jezebel will write the article and frame it so as that woman was attacked just because she was a woman. They don't care about your opposition, silly - they just care if they can paint men in a bad light.

The real breakthrough would be an evil, rude, revolting and insane Disney princess, but the audience would not take that easily.

Then why did she use a stereotype in the first place? Using it and then apologizing for it in advance seem to be a hypocrisy. I guess it's ok to use stereotypes when they're aimed at cis white dudes, right?

You obviously never read real MRA stuff. They frequently do address issues like that. A Voice for Men, for example.

Agreed. The heights of Jezebel research are: "single boys are stinky and gross", "evil men rape" and "we hate men". No wonder they're so opposed to someone exercising logic or thinking. Jezebel is all about feelings - feelings and a confirmation of a preset view of the world.