Then I'm really confused. I've been directed to Jezebel by many online self-identifying feminists and given citations from it. Also, if the stated audience is women, it says ill of the website that men as a sex are portraited in a continuously and consistently negative light. I simply don't get the vitriol and hate…

"Jezebel doesn't write for your audience, anyway, so it doesn't have to cover every single attempt when it's just publishing perspectives from victims."

Sure:

Where are the touching stories about older females abusing underage boys? Oh, I remembered: the line of Jezebel is to portrait men as evil, and women as angelic victims. Right.

"parrots that old MRA talking point about how men do shitty in school"

Because some people don't understand that being a victim of something doesn't give you a free pass to do everything. Is whole life all black and white to you? Men evil, women good? I'm not defending what he's done - I'm saying what she's done was bad.

Do you realize you're defending a lynching? What will happen when we take justice into our own hands? My father also psychologically abused me - as my mother did. She also hit me in a face a few times. Does this mean I had a free pass to injure and maim them in their sleep? Do you think I had a right to bash my…

The one that didn't want to blind the other? "Going for the good eye"?

" I aimed for his good eye and threw it as hard as I could."

How could he exactly be a deadbeat dad if he was in prison for 12 years?

It's also dumb for you to not read what I wrote: that nowhere I said that ALL WOMEN are going to be dumb in the same way - just that there is enough of them supporting the notion of sexism and ageism. Actually, in a post slightly above, I specifically mentioned that.

I wonder, if this is true that there wasn't a generation in the world history which didn't contribute anything? Still, someone who just wants an entire generation to just die already is not a human being, period.

Of course I did not. I specifically said "with many of her peers seconding", which means NOT ALL of you agreed with her. Yet, the comment itself was hateful - *and not gray at all*, which does mean it's "legitimate" to the site.

I think all men should read this thread. So, based on actually *nothing*, a man can be publicly called a repulsive dirty old creep by a woman, with many of her peers seconding, even if his life is an indicator of him being a supporter of feminism and women's rights. Facts don't matter, gut feelings do.

And when you're old, the *next* generation, taught by yout treatment of the previous, will literally give you hell.

So you had a "gut" feeling based on just seeing his photo as an old man. And you call him "repulsive, dirty, creepy".

This article is creepy on so many levels it's genuinely disturbing. So old people who are past their prime are to be discarded and waited upon to die, just because they don't meet the "progressive" requirements of the modern, current avant guarde? And we're talking about grandparents in the comment, the same people…

"I know my experience is not everyone's experience, but I've only had rad lady bosses. I've had some good male bosses, too."

So many big, smart words, and all masquerading some good old sexism.

And I'm not rich, either by my country standards (Poland) or especially by America's standards. But I satisfy two of the three characteristics you mentioned: I'm white (just like 99,99% of Polish people are) and male (just like almost 50% of Polish people are). So am I insulted? Yes, I am.