Lezzie_Borden
Lezzie Borden
Lezzie_Borden

I was just about to post this same gif. I could take or leave the dress, but those beautiful shoes. I need those shoes. Give me those shoes!!!!

I really like AHS, but this just looks like a second-rate imitation of Carnivale. That show was amazing and it's unlikely that AHS will even come close to matching its greatness.

Gisele is obviously quite fit, but this whole commercial is so eye-roll inducing. I don't have an problem with her modeling their clothes, but acting like they have to fight against the "haters" for bucking the status quo and being so mega controversial by having a tall, fit, beautiful supermodel model their clothes

First, you don't always know what your parents are like. One of my best friend's parents are racist, crazy rednecks, but they accepted her being gay easily. My born again Christian grandmom was completely accepting of my gayness, but my extremely liberal parents took over a decade to accept it, including many painful

Yes! Her facial expressions are so uncomfortable. I don't know if she's trying to make fun of the "open mouth sexy looks," but it's painful to look at. It looks so Zoolander

Vaginas are most certainly not only to direct sperm to an egg. Let's talk about what other reasons they exist, shall we? You obviously need some schooling on vaginas. They also are used for 5-7 days every single month for most of woman's life to serve as a waste removal process for the uterine walls. They are used as

It's not any more unethical or selfish than a fertile, heterosexual couple wanting to have a biological child when there are tons of kids in foster care. Either way, they are bringing a child into the world when there are other children who need homes, so why is it only infertile and queer people who are ever called

I always thought scissoring wasn't a thing, until I started doing it. It's definitely a thing, a really amazing thing.

While it definitely seems likely that LGBT people adopt at higher rates, the study isn't limited to adoptive parents, so you can't just dismiss it as parents who adopt versus those who don't. This study did include typical queer parents like those women on your block. While that doesn't completely control for that

I did read what you wrote and it boils down to your gut feelings versus scientific evidence. It's not vitriolic to say that your opinion has been proven wrong. It's just a fact. Every concern every person has isn't valid. I will openly admit that most of my concerns and worries are complete nonsense. Scientific

I'm not projecting anything, I'm just pointing out that no amount of scientific evidence will stop you from being concerned, because science as already addressed your concerns. If you don't want to listen to the scientific evidence, then what else do want? Do you want everyone to pat your hand and reassure you that

Perhaps the reason you think your doctor is not engaging you is that it's clear that no amount of scientific evidence to the contrary will ever stop you from thinking what you think. You have a gut feeling and, even though people have given you copious scientific evidence to that proves that your gut feeling isn't

Now playing

Anyone else immediately think about "Sugar Lumps" where that guy comes into Dave's store with his dick in sling and sells his balls as hacky sacks? Maybe this guy just needed $10 and a frisbee.

I'm just going to say it- I think Jenna Lyons always looks a mess. I hate her style and the whole direction that J. Crew has been heading. There is a difference between looking stylishly casual and looking like a frumpy mess in ill fitting clothes. She always looks the latter.

My point, that you don't seen to grasp, that you don't get to tell JK Rowling or anyone else how they interpret a character. You don't get to control anyone else's imagination, including the author's. It's not changing canon for her to imagine her character however she wants, just as it not changing canon for me to

"JK Rowling did not write Dumbledore as a gay character - for the entire publication history of Harry Potter it was never mentioned that Dumbledore was gay."

For goodness sake, she would be retconning Harry Potter by making him gay, because he's described as heterosexual (or at least romantically interested in women) in the books. That is an example of changing canon (maybe, although as you said he could be bi), because canon is something established in the books. An

Actually, no, that's not what canon means. As far as I can remember, Umbridge's parents were not ever described in the books or movies. Honestly, answer this question: if in an interview JK Rowling said "I imagine that Dolores Umbridge came from a very unloving home" would you consider that a change in canon? Would

Just because a certain characteristic isn't described in a book or movie doesn't mean that the assumption is that the characteristic doesn't exist. That's completely absurd. Authors don't get into every single aspect of every single character. If JK Rowling had said "I always imagined Dumbledore hated

"I have my doubts that any viking would admit to being gay, even under his breath."