"The information can be found someplace else, but do people actually have access to it? No. "

Relying on one method is lazy.

Tech blog is being generous. Engadget is a tech blog. This is a fluff blog that once in a blue moon talks about tech.

Ah, another loser who added a star to their avatar in a pathetic attempt to cling on to the one thing they had going on in their life. I don't converse with you people.

People also tend to get overly obsessed with new technological advances. I mean, look at how many of you cannot function for one day unless you are somehow connected to the Internet. You've forgotten how to actually live life instead of it being dictated to you by a network of computers.

The single greatest creation? Please. The wheel did far more for mankind than the Internet ever will. Who cares about a Tesla museum? Entertainment wouldn't stagnate. It changed on it's own before the Internet came along. All the Internet did was allow people with no skills and no talent to think they had some of each…

Plus $39.99 for shipping.

That's fine, and that kind of thing has existed for a long time, before the Internet became popular in the mid 90s. But the Internet as it is today is what I am talking about; more specifically the World Wide Web. the Internet would be a lot more useful and less intrusive without the web.

All stuff readily available elsewhere to everybody. The only difference is that the lazy can continue to be lazy by staying in their home.

I wouldn't mind seeing what would happen to a corpse that was left on the moon, both in a space suit and out of one. They should bring a couple along the next time they go to the moon (if there is a next time).

You forget that this is a country that still uses the outdated empirical system, and is populated by people that still think there is a magical man sitting in the clouds who created everything.

See my reply to your stupidity in the other post with the moon landing video.

And Les Nesman, Venus Flytrap, Johnny Fever, and the rest of the gang at WKRP.

And because if they had faked it, the USSR would have said something. But they didn't, because they watched the whole thing happen as they tracked Apollo 11.

Here is a question: If the moon landing never happened, why didn't the USA's bitter rival, the USSR, ever say anything about it? Why didn't they expose the US and get the upper hand in the Cold War and Space Race?

If the USA never made it to the moon, the USSR would have let everybody know. This was during the Cold War and the Space Race. The USSR was watching Apollo 11 the whole way. They watched it go to the moon, they watched it stay there, and come back however many days later. And they watched other Apollo missions do the…

You act like if there was no Internet, the global economy would be in tatters. You forget that everything ran just fine before the mid-1990s.

Don't know. But who cares? It's Egypt.

I want to know where the money came from to buy all the Lego that was necessary. Everyone knows that a small 240-piece set will run you $30, and some of the large sets are $90+.

You just demonstrated why the Internet is a curse.