Just how dense the writing was. I started to glaze over. Not very flattering impression of me I know, but if the idea of reading something like that doesn't grab me in the first place, it's got no chance.

Couch co-op with Diablo 3 feels like it was always meant to be played that way, trust me.

I wouldn't dream of playing it online, a dedicated soloer like yourself, but same-screen co-op was like a revelation. I even got my girlfriend playing and actually having fun and she's not really into playing games (prefers to…

I see your point, but Fox would've Ok'd such use for their IP.

I'm not into Dragon Ball Z, or fighting games for that matter, but damn that looks like it should.

As a Britisher, I just have to ignore American food terminology. It makes my eye twitch.

At least Marvel has a chance at making the character good, though. I'll never be able to take Fox's take seriously after this.

Holy shit so much wrong with that ad. Shilling X-men AND being extremely sexist to boot! Well done, Fox. Well done.

That is the worst looking wig I've seen in a while. I guess Marvel's Quicksilver wins by default, now.

I wouldn't say Rickon either, just because he's such a non-character really, and would probably be depicted with his dire wolf (obviously I'm giving these sellers more credit than they probably deserve)

Doesn't the Wheel of Time dude have him beaten? Not that I care about such things, as I haven't been anywhere near WoT since some friends tried to convince me to read it, bought me the first book as an unwanted Birthday present, and I couldn't make it past the first two pages.

1. That's not Osha, it's the Wildling Woman Jon spares, yes.
2. Yes.
3. Yes.
4. I would say Arya, as I would expect a Bran figure to be attached to a Hodor figure, but honestly it's not a very good figure of either.

Me either. I felt like it was a private joke by the author/artist

Star Wars: The Old Republic is a better game than this, but that didn't retain the subscription base and went F2p, even though they said they wouldn't do that. Logic would suggest it will happen with this game, only probably sooner.

TES: Online, announced 2012, started development 5 years previous. (2012-5 = 2007). TESIV: Oblivion was released in 2006.

Lawyered.

So you're saying you've got blind fanboyism and you're incapable of objectivity in regard to the Elder Scrolls license. Gotcha.

I think maybe you haven't been playing Elder Scrolls very long. That colossal fan-base has been around since Morrowind. Certainly mainstream since Oblivion. And this game hasn't been in development that long.

Sorry, I didn't even read the specs :D

Unsurprising that customers get burned on what was always a massive cash-in. This had 'fleece everyone for six months to pay for the development then go f2p, then shut down' written all over it. I feel bad for those that hoped for more, but let's be honest it was pretty naive.

yeah something's off there mate, that's for sure

You can mostly ignore specs if you've been playing games from the last year or so without issue. So you can't play it on ultra super rainbow settings - you'll still be aw to play the game at a decent fps with a decent look and it'll still probably look better than the console versions