I’m sorry but that seems intensely silly. The US did not fight the Vietnamese, Iraq or Afghan Navy.

I’m sure there are lots of steam achievements with only one person or no people having gotten them. They belong to games like this one; games that no one plays.

Oh, now I’m really confused. You’re not a lawyer, yet you’re arguing with a lawyer who practices in the same county and district as all these folks about whether this case was winnable in 2005. Why?

I’m sorry, what did you think Mutually Assured Destruction meant? That was the whole point. Nuclear deterrence is all about the idea that if you attack, you won’t have a country left, even if you “win”.

Most of the commenters here have NO fucking idea what they are talking about.

It’s France’s attempt to stay secular. Their fear is that if hijabs are allowed, Muslims will force non-Muslims to wear them. Which sounds crazy if you American, because we have people wearing hijabs in this nation and no one is forcing non-Muslims to wear them. But things are different in Europe such you have schools…

Two points: 2004 school law says no head covering at all (as well as no other “large” religious symbols on the students’ and teachers’ bodies) only in school. Only in school.

I’ve thought about this comment for a couple minutes now, and I’ve decided I have no clue how you reached this conclusion.

Absolutely insane that terrorist attacks in the West would resonate with people in the West. I just can’t fathom it.

Good. The drug’s astroturf campaign was unpleasant, as was its co-opting of women’s organizations to push a drug that barely works (10% of users experienced one extra sexual encounter a month), further negatively pathologizes low libido, and actively makes life kinda suck (for any user who wants to also enjoy a glass…

The response of the students to their meeting with school executives is embarrassing. They’re complaining about a lack of “empathy” from people that are acting professionally. These aren’t their therapists; it’s the goddamn DEAN OF THE SCHOOL..

Yep. That letter basically boiled down to, “These students are adults in the eyes of the law. They can figure some stuff out on their own.”

No one is interested in facts, smarty pants. Take that shit back to your fancy pants university!

Did anyone actually read the Yale professors response to the halloween costume letter?

“What they and others disregard is the dangerous implication that minorities at Yale should feel lucky”

Found the delusional SJW, everyone!

Are you saying that eminent domain shoudn’t exist? Because that would be rather daft.

The guy who I’m replying to that has no knowledge of the facts of the case cares. Theres enough room for outrage within the actual facts without making stuff up or being ignorant.

You made a typo. Whether you were in the process of fixing it when called out or not, you got called out (and not even in a particularly rude way). The general response is “It’s been fixed, thanks.” Getting things right is your job. You shouldn’t be so scandalized when someone points out a typo. Calm yourself and…

First rule of Gawker Media, never admit you fucked up