LaceratingSlyer
LaceratingSlyer
LaceratingSlyer

No offense, but you're part of the problem with people who are so upset with these launches. You assume that because you know of cloud servers that you have some insight into what these companies have been trying to do when you really have no clue. It's not as simple as just add a few more servers, if it were they'd

The problem isn't really experience for companies, though yes D3 and SimCity did have to happen to make things better. The problem is the sheer number of people accessing these services on day 1. You can all say you want and expect companies to be able to handle it, but realistically they're not going to setup a

I don't think I'm wrong about it at all. Yes, some men won't behave this way, especially in front of others. But as you have intelligent friends who don't do it, I have intelligent gamer friends who all have white and blue collar jobs in a wide range of fields (from technical to business to construction) who all

Except that it's not just immature males who behave this way, but males in general. It's true that not all males behave like this, but it's pretty ignorant to think that only immature teens are the only ones who act like this. Males of all sorts act in this way, and most of them aren't necessarily immature.

To be fair, it's not just gamers, but men in general that are like this.

How in any way is it inappropriate? He's criticizing a film on the internet, something a lot of people get paid to do but he's doing it to educate others. It's the internet, it's not like he came running out of the theater and yelled about all the inaccuracies around people who had just seen it.

You're taking it to an extreme that isn't intended by him at all. He's simply educating people and because you dislike how he does it by criticizing a film you think it's stupid. Just because something is a work of fiction doesn't mean we can't look at aspects of it and question how realistic they are.

You're basically saying that we should all be ignorant to the factual fallacies of the film and only focus on the drama. I have no problem with this, until it's incorporated into the script as detailed as it is with this movie. And it's not about being picky, but some of his points make you wonder if they even

Yet all of that is crumbs compared to what schools who even just barely make a bowl game bring in because of those players.

You can find an argument for it yes, but that's simply an argument for it and not necessarily the accepted meaning. It actually being a defined derogatory word is completely different.

You're right, people can take offense to anything. But in this case, with the term "Redskins", you can't really find an argument against it not being a derogatory word. That's not an opinion in any way, it's a fact that it was and is a derogatory word, and people being offended by it shouldn't be written off just

Well my concern is that he writes off the fact that people are offended because in his opinion not enough are offended for it to matter. Yet technically in order for it to be offensive it only takes one person to be offended. He just has an extremely ignorant point of view on the matter.

The problem with that article is he only interviews people who aren't offended by the names of some sport teams. He then tries to reach the radical conclusion that because a few of them are minorities that have "justification" to be offended but aren't, then none must exist so it's only "unjustified" people that are

It's not about double standards at all though...

Obviously it shouldn't be used to distract a child when they're misbehaving, and assuming that a parent who lets their child play a video game, or watch a dvd is being irresponsible is pretty ignorant.

I'm not sure how many people here have kids, but it seems like a lot of the comments are from ignorant people who think it's as simple as not giving kids an electronic device while travelling.

I think the reason why WWII is so often used in video games is because it's got the basic element that most games require. The very premise of good versus evil is epitomized so well with WWII that no other war can really compare. No other war has as close of the element of good versus evil because all wars have sides

I respectfully disagree with your opinion on baseball. The problem is that most people don't realize the complexity of baseball because for the players it's so automatic at this point in their careers once they reach the Majors that they make it look/seem easy. The mind game between the pitcher/catcher and batter, the

No offense, your post is a bit ignorant. The scripting capabilities alone are enough to prefer Office over LibreOffice, but there's far more to it than just that. Especially inter-connectivity between all of the software applications and furthermore Sharepoint accessibility, makes Office superior in so many ways that

True, but this comes off more as a way to completely ignore such issues rather than actually deal with them and that's all I was trying to point out.