LaceratingSlyer
LaceratingSlyer
LaceratingSlyer

Either way, if it's an addiction or not, there are other methods they should be doing rather than ignoring the fact that they can't control themselves. If someone can't stay off their phone for an hour, especially when they're with other people, they have deeper issues than not being able to stay off their phone and

I really hate to be rude, but this seems really ridiculous. It's as stupid as those people who go out to dinner with friends and has everyone put their phones on the table in the middle, and whoever can't resist the urge to use their phone pays for dinner.

The ignorance in this post is beyond words...

That's a big reason why I believe 4k won't catch on outside of PC monitors. In order for your eyes to tell the difference in a 4k tv and a 1080p HDtv on a 50" screen you'd have to be within 15 feet or so. Furthermore, there's literally nothing formatted in 4k definition for you to display currently, which completely

While I don't disagree that proof is needed to buy into this, it's the next revolution of gaming really. All of your devices being able to play the same games you own and continue save states from one device to another. It can't be as ridiculous as you think if both companies are attempting it as well. I mean it

I never assumed anything about you. I'm just pointing out that typically your opinion comes from people who have never experienced discrimination themselves and assume it's not as bad as people make it out to be. You made the argument that people should learn to grow a thicker skin, while in this case it may be

But again, how inherently harmful it is to someone is all a matter of perspective. Who are you to say to someone who finds this offensive due to dealing with it on a daily basis that they're being overly sensitive and should brush it off?

Said by someone who doesn't have to deal with discrimination on a normal basis? Again, this is about people completely neglecting other people's perspectives and assuming, ignorantly mind you, that their point of view is the norm and that no one has to deal with any sort of discrimination in this day and age.

I never suggested censorship be enforced due to it, I was simply pointing out how outrageous it is to claim that people don't have any right to be offended. I actually do think this situation was mild, but as was pointed out in the article, it effects people differently. And people who put up with it on a daily basis

"It's a joke. By definition it exists to entertain. If someone gets offended by it, that's on them. If someone thinks it's in poor taste, tough shit. If you're not particularly entertained, dismiss it and move on. It's a real pity that we've come to a point in a society built on freedom of speech and freedom of

Are you joking? LA Noire was designed specifically so you had to try to read people's expressions in order to figure out clues and interrogate them correctly. They couldn't have made a game better designed for the facial recognition features they had.

Firstly, they've gotten the message. They've listened to complaints and are still, and will continue to, changing the game to meet players' expectations.

I find it odd how you compare D3's entertainment to someone hold a gun to your head while it doesn't have half the tedious and monotonous issues Path of Exile has just in order to have fun.

Common decency? You act as though she stole the game from Goodwill. It's not her fault they didn't sell it for an accurate amount, nor should she feel bad about it. I get what you're trying to say here, but making her out like the bad guy in this situation is a bit much. You completely forget though that her purchase

Did you really just say a gun isn't inherently dangerous? Just because a gun is an inanimate object that requires someone to use it in order for it to do harm doesn't mean it's not inherently dangerous.

The problem isn't the online minority of gamers who make themselves known vocally. It's the typical gamer who doesn't care about what the publishers do and actually like it in some cases. I mean if you ask an average gamer who plays the Assassin's Creed or Call of Duty series, or religiously buys Madden every year

This is called "email".

The disparity is that in a major corporation making a game those developers are getting paid to make that game and their pay isn't reliant on the success of that game. Indie devs have the exact opposite issue and have no income while making their game outside of another job or previous product sales.

I think there are some sound concepts in what he's talking about, but the primary issue as I said is the extreme disparity between major developers and indie developers in terms of money and other various things. Another issue is that the whole episodic game releases haven't worked out too well. Sure there was the

I gotta agree with PS4inYomouth in that is a completely unrealistic view of how the gaming industry can work. People don't have the ability to take a huge risk with so little of a chance of profit. That profit being in the multi-millions, or even billions doesn't make up for the fact that the risk is just way too