Knights-knights-knights
Knights.knights.knights
Knights-knights-knights

Like many other have said, you do realize she has been dressing like this in literally every single game she's been in, what do you think it's under that armor?

Or modern sportswear for female athletes.

*fake character wears sportwear*

"So we figured, hey, let's draw attention to racial inequalities in America by walking hand-in-hand out from this inflatable thing with a purple injun on it."

Someone help me out here. I'm a Christian and do my best to lead a traditional, moral life. If I speak out against abortion or same-sex marriage, people will retort "Hey, if you don't like 'xyz' don't get/have one!"

So, how does that logic not apply here? If you don't like this outfit either don't buy the game or

Retarded Feminists: RAWR

oh em gee. samus's virtue as a female character is solely dependent on her fashion choices. not her personality or what the hell she has done as a character. you know what people? if her appearance is the only thing you base your opinions off on her, then maybe YOU are the ones objectifying her. she is still a strong

It's pretty much literally sports wear. If you can't respect women who wear sportswear you have an issue. Would you rather she was shoved in a burka?

It's fun reading the article and then reading all of the comments from people who didn't.

Yeah cause Ripley couldn't have whooped your ass at the end of alien in her paintes. Women can't be sexy and powerful at the same time to you people. Powerful and strong means dressing modestly. Got it.

>the designs are from old GBA games

GotG reference?

+1 if that is a reference to what I think it is.

Get rid of Burner. Seriously, there is absolutely no reason why Gawker needs to continue to allow for "anonymous" posting anymore. Stop using a sword when a scalpel will do.

Oh yes, and it actually has an influence on how people comment too. Instead of expressing their honest opinions, users might be pushed into making eye-catching/attention-grabbing posts in order to be noticed and starred. Views that go against the norms (for example, criticisms of popular games) might also be ignored.

So back to the Gawker circlejerk, then. Disappointing.

I never liked the "Grey" system. It encourages homogenous discussions.

Ugh, I really didn't like that old system. As someone who didn't comment a ton, and didn't become an "approved" poster, I felt discouraged from commenting since the few times I did, they'd just be perpetually invisible.

Yup, so disagreeing with something an article says or not not being one of the "popular kids" basically means no one sees your comments.

It's like a Reddit circlejerk!