KlebertLHall
Klebert L. Hall
KlebertLHall

Pretty sure my ‘69 W series Power Wagon could do that just fine. I would place no bets upon stopping well, though. Also lots of even older production vehicles.

Right, because an unreliable and expensive to repair Honda Ridgeline that costs $90,000 new was just what we need to save the world.

Because people are imbeciles.

Because ridiculously expensive and vastly unreliable (over the long term) automated systems are so much better than just making sure people know how to drive before giving them a goddamned license.

Yeah, that’s very much like a truck.

Shocking, really.

Well, judging by the success of the movies...

My ‘67 Polara could do that too. Doesn’t make it more or less of a “truck”, since it’s a 50 year old car.

I bet that across the entire range, similarly equipped vehicles from different manufacturers vary by no more than 2mpg.

So this idiotic thing is now a “truck” ?

I already knew how they work - badly.

Scout wasn’t a brand, it was a series of models.

This is not rocket science.

“Dole”.

Untimely? I think not.

Those things were serious rusters.

The ford 391 on the spec sheet would actually be pretty seriously out of place in a stock pickup. It’s an FT engine, not the FE used in pickup.

I don’t have a lot of data on your vehicle here, but check the alternator gauge and the firewall electrical connector (if it has one). In a lot of MoPars during the era of the 440, all electrical power went through those two points, and corrosion often caused failure (and sometimes fire). Usually that results in the

Sure.

Sure, that’s all nice.