That was a fine and logical criticism, until you suggested Haas. Seriously? The team that is only as good as their second-hand knowledge from Ferrari allows them to be? If there is a team guaranteed not to move into the tier-1, which is not explicitly a junior team of one of the big three, it’s Haas.

“Let’s put it this way. You have a 1-ohm load hooked up to a 10-V battery that is rated at 1 A-h (amp-hour). That circuit produces 10 Watts of power (1 Ampere at 10 Volts), and the battery can sustain that for about 1 hour.”

“Okay, so he wasn’t smart enough to set aside any money to live off after he cashed out of PayPal, and he wasn’t focused enough to put all his effort into one company.”

“Ever seen how the rare eath minerals are mined that make Tesla’s batteries???”

“All technology should be used to fix our Earth, not escape it.”

What the shit are you talking about?

It’s one guy who writes for the NY Times, not the whole organisation putting out a statement saying they were wrong about Trump.

Oh, so now opinion pieces count do they?

You are a retard. That link says nothing about it being Trump’s policies that have led to the near complete defeat of ISIS.

It’s all fucked. Everything is fucked.

Mmm, but I’m sure when it makes a close pass to Earth someone will manage to detect it. And fuck, I had “you’re” instead of “your” and now it’s too late to edit.

Yeah, but if you observe the position of the Tesla at any point in the future you can then start again with close to 100% accuracy in your predictions. The idea that we have no idea where exactly the Tesla is going to be in X number of years is true, but it’s only true right now.

I was skeptical of the Elon Musk hype, when Tesla was only producing a weird electric Lotus and SpaceX was only launching toy rockets.

Not with that attitude (or position).

I agree with your last sentence, that they need not have shot the person at all. But the rest of what you’re saying is irrelevant, because if you could ask the innocent man (who is now dead, so you can’t) what he would have preferred, I think he would have taken his chances with the shot to the lower abdomen or back.

For your first two paragraphs: You say he was no threat in “hindsight”, like the lack of the benefit of hindsight excuses this. It doesn’t. The police officer did not have enough information to justify the action that they took. That is on them.

“If you think it is so easy, why don’t you join the police force and show them how it’s done? It’s easy to judge others when you aren’t the one putting their life on the line to serve the public.”

“almost no police are willing to give a chance for someone to put them in the dirt even if it means more lives would be saved.”

“Your recommendations are all counter to each other”

Exactly, the fuss over this is almost nonsensical. Sure, they shouldn’t be releasing debug code, and it’s worse that it’s for something as low-level as a driver, but it’s almost like freaking out about any other debugging/troubleshooting feature that’s intentionally present (e.g request logging on a web server).