While we’re never going to get a completely objective definition of “luxury”, in general, they have substantially better interior materials - soft-touch instead of hard plastic, usually leather seats, or a high-quality alternative (for example, newer Teslas), better interior fit and finish, and often bits of real…

Ah, Reddit, I should have thought of that. I'm only on the SpaceX subreddit, so, not a lot of potential buyers there (that I know of!!) Lol

Except the city has said the guy is wrong, and they're 3" high. Also, look closely at the photo - any stock car would have no no trouble with that wide and modest hump.

It's 2019, so somewhere on the internet, someone is willing to pay $ for that jar of pee. Probably on eBay 😂😂

I’ve seen both, and they’re both Trek, but different. I’ll admit I gave up on Discovery after 5 or 6 episodes, but that was as much because I don’t have a CBS streaming account, and had to log in with my brothers credentials, which was a minor nuisance.

No, because FB is not exercising “editorial control” or singling out a point of view, they’re merely enforcing their terms of service. Much like Craigslist won’t let you post ads that violates their TOS. Or any other platform can remove you for posting content that violates TOS. FB doesn’t have to *perfectly evenly*…

This article made so much more sense when I read it as satire, or perhaps extremely subtle sarcasm. ‘Cause that thing is FUGLY. I very seriously assumed it was a prank Photoshop when I saw that leering rictus of a front grill scroll by at first. *Shudder* 

Great minds think alike, Erin Marquis! I read her request, and immediately thought of the XC40 and XC60. I think a lightly-driven 2018 or 2019 XC60 could also be had for $35K or less...

Can I complain to them about their management? Hahaha

Ultimately, dirty coal-fired power plants in Bavaria are going away, as they are already shutting down in America and China. And as those power plants are replaced with some combination of natural gas, solar, wind, and (in some countries) nuclear, the entire argument about what pollutes more goes away - as the…

There’s one in Wakanda, and a few in in Narnia, that account for most of the sales.

Great investigative work. Sad there was no Ron the Bear. I wonder if the giraffe had a name!

So, just to be clear, this sentence of yours is factually incorrect;

Maybe they'll switch to solid-state batteries in a couple years, which don't have the same puncture fire risks as "wet" li-ion.

It’s like a Mini Cooper and a Rav4 had a baby...

I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit... It’s the only way to be sure...

Yeah, and now with the “2 screen HD streams”, my plan is jumping to $15.99, which is moving out of “impulse buy” territory.

I was reading this article, internally dismissing the idea of ever signing up for it, and then I saw the $6.99. I have to admit, they’re pricing it competitively. That’s like, what, one venti triple latte at a Starbucks (including tip). Hmmmm

Perhaps you should READ my comment in its entirety, where I specifically mentioned public conveyances as being subject to different laws (along with public accommodation). A website is not a public accommodation. Websites can ban you for your political beliefs - Twitter, Facebook, et al, have done exactly that.

It's wrong because your original comment didn't say "fossil fuels", it said "coal". If you can't admit when you're wrong, then you're a troll.