I totally agree. When a teenager gets gun downed in the street, the response—the nitpicking shit. I don't know. I just don't know what to say but there are ways that people are denying his humanity, which in turns, erodes theirs.
I totally agree. When a teenager gets gun downed in the street, the response—the nitpicking shit. I don't know. I just don't know what to say but there are ways that people are denying his humanity, which in turns, erodes theirs.
I think there should be a term for omitting characters. It should be called "Coldhanded". Like "Man, Lady Stoneheart got coldhanded" or "Wow, they coldhanded Arianne?"
Man, Gnosticism is always the go-to heresy for filmmakers. Still waiting for the film based on Arianism, Donatism, or Nestorianism.
I hope the ropes of heavens ring can handle what's coming.
Man, you know why Brave and the Bold was so fun? It's because it's, basically, a Laurel-and-Hardy routine. Batman plays the straight man to all the weird stuff that happens around him. It's not discordant, because he accepts it, but he's still got the seriousness that has come to (nearly) define the character.
I was disappointed they left out that the two witnesses only remain dead for 3-1/2 days and are then resurrected.
In Ursula K. Le Guin's novel The Dispossessed, an anarchist-communist civilization is built on the marginally-habitable moon of Anarres. Despite the harsh environment and the lingering hierarchical/propertarian tendencies of some Anarresti, their culture carries on and thrives for generations.
Yes, his science is certainly indisputable. A male (north) and female (south) pole magnet attract and form a bond. But I wish to take his theory further. My research shows that a stack of magnets forms a FAR stronger bond. Clearly this is an indication that marriage is meant to be polygamous. The more men and…
Um, guys? I know you might not like to hear this, but it's time to let 1986 go.
I do not like this at all.
It's the perfect criticism of the movie. That was really insightful Batman. I knew that I liked some parts and wasn't crazy about others but bottom line that is why it didn't feel like a Superman film to me.
i love these as well, although i've always felt like the cartoon was sort of saying, "oh that naughty lois, look what she's done again. She was told to stay! That's what you get for not listening, ladies."
I scrolled through all the comments to make sure someone had already pointed this out.
Nitpick: Elleria Sand is not a Sand Snake. The Sand Snakes are Prince Oberyn Martell's bastard daughters. Elleria Sand is Prince Oberyn's mistress.
I think the most problematic thing is the whole way Pa Kent is handled. He's supposed to be the character that instills the humanist qualities into Clark, not turn him into a paranoid kid.
This scene shouldn't have happened at all. I can totally see Jonathan telling Clark not to save him because other people were in danger. But to just save his own skin? Meh.
Just once, I wouldn't mind seeing Jonathan Kent live to see his son as the world's greatest hero, and still be the one guy that Superman could go to who would be down to Earth with him.
SPOILERS.