KeepBringingIt
KeepBringingIt
KeepBringingIt

I gotta get some popcorn because the jezebecky lot are going to be salty as hell and I love to see it.

The game needed this; we all needed this! And the way they’re making people wait for that album drop (chef’s kiss). The sound is just taking me back - and I about fell out my seat when Paak laid there dead LOL! 

I’m not here for this. It reeks of Alabama trying to make itself look less like the trash ass place that it is.

It’s completely inline with the racist nature of the US - if we convict a black person, they should be barred from all civil discussion because our society is perfect (as dictated by angry, inbred rural Alabamians)(Huntsville born and raised).

Was going to write exactly that.

Clearing the arrest records of unjustly prosecuted and persecuted dead people only eases the guilty conscience of the oppressor. Instead, why don’t we just expunge Alabama along with the rest of the zombie confederacy?

I think this is a bad idea. It’s part of history. The only reason the state of Alabama would consider this is so that it can pretend that certain events never occurred. 

This is some bullshit. Expunging their arrest records would be the worst possible insult to Dr. King and Rosa Parks. They were proud to be arrested and convicted of violating shitty unfair laws.  History has vindicated their decisions. Never let their records be erased. They must stand for all time.

Fuck all that. He was brandishing. No other reason needs to be given.

The unseasoned grays are working hard.

Their families should be suing this son of a bitch for defamation.

Fixed that for you.

Ah, the ole American “white wash” has begun.

It has all been this one judge, from what I read. Same dude has intervened on the side of the accused repeatedly. That isn’t court shopping. Hell, I think at this point they SHOULD go court shopping, because that judge is not impartial. He won’t let them show evidence Rittenhouse was affiliated with the Proud Boys. He

Can’t call Rosenbaum and Huber victims because it’s prejudicial to the defendant, but they can be called looters and rioters, without evidence that they committed any looting or rioting because that’s not prejudicial to the "decedents" 

The judge should be wearing a white robe - with a hood - instead of a Black one as he has now shown his prejudice against the victims by stating they can be called anything but victims. I guess if there aren't victims,  then he can't be guilty of murder? But based upon limited evidence,  they can definitely be

Yeah, and those actions against him came AFTER he killed the victims, not before, so the prosecution needs to lay out a clear timeline of such actions.

Same judge that ruled that Rittenhouse’s bail couldn’t be raised, and who aided Rittenhouse moving locations without telling authorities? Who denied requests to re-arrest Rittenhouse for ghosting the police (with the judge’s help?). That judge?

Sounds to me like he has been all-in in favor of Rittenhouse all along, and