Bullies ALWAYS play as the victim.

Huh. I thought Coe had repented his racist and bigoted past?

Like, even if we pretended that “Stone Cold Steve Austin if WWF didn’t sign him in 1996 and his life took a tailspin into the gutter” over here was on the morally righteous side of this fight...who the fuck starts a confrontation with people minding their own business, and THEN complains that the ensuing scrap would…

The fucker looks positively proud in his mugshot. Schmuck.

This man does not look like John Mayer or Jack Nicholson. This man looks like Pete Doherty. (Who, to be fair looks a little like John Mayer). 

Literally one reason: Trump knows EVERY SINGLE ONE of his supporters will tune in and the only reason they will is to beat Biden’s “ratings.” That’s literally it. And then he’ll go on twitter to crow about it for 24 hours straight as proof that he is actually winning (and thus giving him more “evidence” that he’ll get…

WTF is the point of even having a town all if both are on at the same time?

I’ll give Duke Nicholson this. Even in a photo with a pretty dumb look on his face, he still has excellent hair. 

Lol? Two miscarriages with very serious complications and the death of a parent are LOL? Wow. You are an asshole.

Don’t forget that the most advanced firearm the Founders had was a muzzleloading flintlock musket. An AR-15 with a drum mag would be like a WMD to them, and clearly not part of their original intent.

Because I’m an election poll inspector, I have to vote by mail - my hours are 6am to past 9pm, and my precinct is too far away to risk it on my 30-min lunch break. A few weeks ago, our mailman quit this route and his replacement has been totally eff’n up our mail. So, I ended up busing it over to City Hall, asking the…

Not when it’s true, no.

Somehow I imagine her memory of the constitution also gets a little fuzzy when it comes to the “well-regulated militia” part of those gun rights.

By her definition, calling her a bitch doesn't count as hostile either.

It’s just an excuse they use to justify twisting the law to support their regressive beliefs. They don't really mean it, if that helps (it doesn't).

As someone who was raised Catholic (no longer practicing), I don’t believe anything hardcore Catholics like her say. When she says she will not let her “faith” impact her decisions she is flat out lying. They are also hypocrites because they hide their hardcore beliefs when its convenient for them to do so.  You know,…

Not only that, but they understood the Constitution could change with the times, so they added the ability to amend it.

Remember the time when W was shamed into withdrawing Harriet Miers from a SCOTUS nomination? That would never happen now. Amazing that that now seems like “the good old days.”

“That means that I interpret the Constitution as a law...I understand it to have the meaning that it had at the time people ratified it. That meaning doesn’t change over time and it’s not up to me to update it or infuse my policy views into it,”

I had hoped that she would be sorta like Roberts in that he leans right, but seems willing to uphold the law in some cases. Low fucking bar, I know, but that was the best anyone could hope for. Instead it appears she is just another religious fundie willing to twist the law any way she can to make sure her racist,…