This isn't even an example of an "Only on Playstation" trailer, it only has the logo to show it's broadcasted by them. Like prety much every single tv station that broadcasts anything. Sony doesn't try as hard to mislead, unlike their console rival.
This isn't even an example of an "Only on Playstation" trailer, it only has the logo to show it's broadcasted by them. Like prety much every single tv station that broadcasts anything. Sony doesn't try as hard to mislead, unlike their console rival.
The binary nature doesn’t necessarily make people read the review, that’s what the problem is in my opinion. People that see a “no” will generally just brand it a bad game, eventhough it could be a decent game that the reviewer just didn’t enjoy as much (Uncharted: Golden Abyss comes to mind). If they see a yes then…
Not contributing to metacritic is indeed a good thing (since metacritic is the worst), but that’s the only good thing about it. If that would really be Kotaku's reason, they could just ask not to be included.
I liked VLR’s plot a lot more (might the best in gaming to me). It’s also a bit more mature, but it’s clearly inspired by Danganronpa with the whodunit trials, the Monokuma clone and the out of this world plot. People tend to prefer the ‘original’. Might be the puzzles vs the social links or the (in my opinion) higher…
Kotaku (or some of it's journalists) is always criticizing scoring systems in gaming, but their binary system is worse than even metacritic. If you really believe giving a game a score is a bad thing (it is to some degree) then get rid of the yes/no binary system to conclude your reviews.
People saying sport X is boring are generally just boasting about how they don’t give a fuck about how ignorant they are.
Between the PS4, 3DS, Vita and the Wii U, all those platforms are vastly different.So when you have to make a choice, might as well go for the two most popular ones.
I love how the Japanese refrain from stereotyping and insulting muslims as a whole.
Yeah, you are right. I meant helping with publishing, not actually being the publisher.
Exactly. Bottom of the barrel today can be accomplished by hobbyists and it will still look much better than a 2001 blockbuster hit. A game with a 10 million plus budget would be double A standards.
It definitely won’t be a cutting edge Uncharted 4 or Ryse, graphical wise. Shenmue was that at the time, but noone that invested in the project expects that now. Just nice enough to hold up by todays standards. Which means it doesn’t need 30+million to make. That's why Suzuki went the Kickstarter route.
It’s not that unclear at all. Sony handles the marketing(showing the game at E3 for example) and publishing, while Suzuki has completely free reign over his self funded project, without having to turn to Sony for every decision (when they would’ve funded development). Marketing is a huge part of the budget, money that…
Inflation is nothing compared to the lowered costs of developing what was expensive to develop back then with todays tools. What made Shenmue expensive is something that can be done much cheaper in this day and age. Think making a Super Mario Bros 4 today when there’s even community tools like Mario Maker compared to…
To each his own of course, but I absolutely hated Gintama a few episodes in, so it better not have gotten even worse.
Why does this guy have boobs? Or is he a she? Edit: the one who says "Are you still pissed".
If anything having faced severe adversities make ‘small’ highlights like these that much more impactful, appreciating the smaller things in life.
Probably because you are both right.
The 70s, when Shaggy started using alternative medicine for his backache
Yes, keep reaching further with every new reply, trying to convince yourself the other party just doesn't know how to debate as if that makes your case stronger. I'm quite amused by the way, so don't worry. The only reason I'm mentioning insults is because it makes your already weak arguments look even worse by having…