People pay plenty already - *without* being an easy lawsuit target.

Far as I'm concerned a game this big would have been sued by now since there's no way you 'wouldn't' know a dance of yours is in Fortnite. And curiously enough, by my observation a lot of entertainers want to be immortalized in Fortnite with a dance.

You can't copyright dance moves. End of.

Show the interaction. Let readers decide his intentions.

A final example of how your argument relies on your opponent being a cartoon villain. Racists, sociopaths, etc.

Not owing apologies to strangers isn't some kind of belief system. I'm simply not convinced how strangers feel is even remotely worth considering. Especially given the ironic standard that my feelings are moot (which itself is fine, but inconsistent).

Your type are authoritarian moralists who justify social by saying things like “______ leads to violence ergo ____.” It starts well enough, shit about apologies for transgressions. Then it’s demanding apologies or else. Then financial ruination is attempted. If possible imprisonment. And prevented from that; violence.…

I’ve seen the next steps for your type of argument when people refuse to ‘understand’. If not financial ruin, imprisonment or violence. What’s never an option is simply accepting people can do, say, or consume offensive things in a free society.

No I’ve been very clear and consistent. The issue is you feel accountability is owed, when it works best as choice. And if people choose otherwise, you people tend to want guys eventually dead or jailed- if the financial ruination thing doesn’t take.

lol Again; you're incapable of seeing this as anything but defending assholes.

“Price, a narrative designer of 10 years, had called out the player, a YouTuber, for explaining the concept of dialogue choices to her.”

Of course not. You people can’t ever hear this kind of point without conflating it with defense of bigots. Even when gay people make the same point. It's a bizzare middle class thing.

Because moral arbiters always end up more dangerous than your ‘words lead to murder’ idea that they tend to start with.

Now you’re talking about murdered people. So if I keep my track, I’m the guy who doesn’t care about murdered people. “Powerful tools against the uninitiated.” But I’m initiated, white bread. My point remains on not owing people apologies if they’re offended. You’re gonna have to embrace the horror that my point isn’t…

It's only ever about people's feelings lol. There's no crime other than hurt feelings. Now if he violated terms by harrassing a user, that's his fuck up, ban him. But this apology thing is meaningless - he don't owe you that.

Apologizing shows no evidence of that, it only makes people feel vindicated after taking offense. He can be a full blown homophobe and they won't care cause he threw together a quick apology. It's madness. How people feel is nobody's burden.

Exactly this. Then he can lose subs or whatever.

It's not posturing to refuse to apologize to everybody who's offended by something.

Unless he directed animus to a person or demographic he knows nobody an apology. The mere utterance of a word gives nobody the privalidge to expect anything.

I have no interest talking about apologies as a concept, that’s your interjection. I’m ignoring it. Because I have no issue with apologies as a thing.