If the knight were noble, he wouldn't kill the peasant shields and try to negotiate.

LMAO!

If you are invincible to attack and you still feel the need to kill people, is pretty stupid IMO.

LMAO! too funny.

Sure, it's a bad analogy, but most are.

That's funny.. I see it all the time on the news. The numbers usually aren't that high though.

Not sure how you go that.

It's not a bad thing to have accurate weapons, my point is that you can't blame Hamas for having inaccurate weapons, since they are an occupied people who are nearly cut off from the rest of the world. In a lot of ways they are very desperate and desperate people use whatever they can find.

Funny, you'd think the government would look to a simple option.. like peace.

There's propaganda on both sides, it's what keeps war parties in power.

LMAO!

How is this not common knowledge.. shame on you Google for keeping this little gem a secret.

I agree with you. However, Israel has bee occupying Gaza for over 40 years and Hamas can't do more than launch rockets, let alone actually hit anything they want.

This isn't much of a fight.. it's like a pro boxer beating on a six year old who's chained to a wall.

They were nearly impotent before that.

If they had guided rockets, I'm sure they'd be using them.

If you don't see an issue with countries bombing each other for 40 years, you yourself must have some issues.

It would be more like a sword fight between a fully armored knight and a shackled peasant with a knife.

I agree, but terrorist groups are often started by one man, out of hatred (or necessity) and based on an (usually religious) ideology.

LMAO!