JonasCdn
JonasCdn
JonasCdn

I disagree. I use a desktop, wired mice only for me. I'm not going to comment on the efficacy of a wired versus wireless mouse, only that I cannot vote for a wireless one. I'd faithfully cast my vote with the Razer Naga, except it's wireless, so I abstain from voting at all.

I disagree. I use a desktop, wired mice only for me. I'm not going to comment on the efficacy of a wired versus

As a guy, at 5'6" and 140# (thin but muscular), my caloric intake is about 1700-1800 calories. I'm not weight-training, but I am active. My best guess is that MamaBearsApron is a slightly under average height woman (the gender is no surprise given the handle/pseudonym). 1200 is not unthinkable by any means.

Processed sugars like in the juice (or post-sweeteners) Beth specifically mentioned? Go to Starbucks (or most other commercial smoothie outlets) and tell me they don't slip in some sweeteners.

You have a point; it’s a fine story. That said, the point of discussion is to, well, discuss it. Nobody here is defending transphobia — people are concerned about the knee-jerk reaction to it when it doesn’t outwardly represent anything to do with transgender (except that a would-be ladies-man was duped, probably in a

Honestly, I’m with a ton of other posters on the subject; there’s simply nothing to imply there’s transgender here. It’s a guy in a dress that someone drunk mistook as a woman (who was likely also incredibly drunk, or otherwise paid to do the prank by others to humiliate the would-be ladies-man). The whole

Wasn’t sure if serious. Carry on!

Methinks you misunderstand. Let’s forget this is a joke, let’s play super-serious for a second (stupid, given it’s limerick, but let’s ignore logic since you clearly are and we’ll humour you for a second).

Probably because you are. A jest is a jest. If you want to read more into it, have at it. Nobody cares. People are too goddamn sensitive.

The only people who _actually_ believe this are typically the sort to play games or get enjoyment in the torment of others in what they often refer to as “the dating game,” or otherwise derive some sort of gain (monetary or otherwise) out of the process. What, lonely people aren’t allowed to get enjoyment? It’s only

Now playing

The dancing was interesting and certainly physically gifted, but certainly nothing that hasn't been done before and done in a more entertaining fashion. They're quite a few years behind (for light-dancing), both in choreography and complexity. A brilliant example: Wrecking Crew.

Wait, what? Is skewing a conversation into weirdo-land a thing? I didn't say men were oppressed nor did I imply as much. Seriously, go re-read the conversation without your odd agenda.

Sorry. I'm Canadian (eh), it was never my attention to draw lines in the sand or anything. Re-casting is a way of injecting a new spin on an old idea, we all know this. I, for one, thought Katee Sackhoff was a brilliant Starbuck (partly because she had Dirk Benedict's charm and insouciance) and I enjoyed that reboot.

Funny, that's my impression of the all-female cast.

Have you ever seen In the Mouth of Madness? While not directly related, it certainly channeled much of what Lovecraft coined in his books. It was also pretty nifty.

A reboot, with an all-female cast of nobodies. That's not how sequels or faithful reboots work; that's not how any of this works.

You probably didn't realise how much you were missing. There's a difference between environmental/area triggers and actual banter. The actual banter is set on an internal clock, which is reset whenever you hit an area trigger or combat. Which is pretty much most of the time.

No, I will not use a joystick on my PC. If I wanted a joystick, I'd use a console.

Which is what caused Win8 to fail; it wasn't the Start button (that just made it more obvious). If they're doggedly going to try and shove tablet operating systems down our throats, Win10 will fail too. It's just the way things are.

Sounds like you want a Surface OS, not a PC OS.

This.