Why wouldn’t people and companies just move to somewhere an income limit isn’t installed? We already have companies sitting on billions of dollars off shore. You don’t think this would make it worse? And what drive would there for people to be innovative? Creative? Take risks? Isn’t that part of what made America so…
JohnConnorforealthistime
JohnConnorforealthistime
This is a ridiculous idea and your logic is very, very flawed.
I thought they just forgot the foot marker after the six. I wanted to comment on how unhealthy their weight is for their height.
That’s awesome! It’s amazing how well she hides. I mean, some of those pictures, if you weren’t looking for it, it’s difficult to see. Pretty crazy.
Still, doubtfull.
Ah yes. The arm chair scientist. I’m sure they haven’t thought of any of that...
Idk, I’m usually pretty drunk at Wisconsin games so I couldn’t tell you.
Ale Asylum isn’t even close. Like most Wisconsin breweries, it’s a malt disaster.
A-FUCKING-MEN. Also, fuck the guy who said Capital anything.
You’re looking too big. You need to look in each brand. Cadillac wants to get you into a Caddy as earlier as possible. So the come in with an entry level CLA/GLA type vehicle for $30k. It’s the same thing Audi and Merc are doing and it’s working. You are getting early 20's buyers ponying up for those type of vehicles.…
I’m not sure that’s too far from the truth haha. But put yourself in his shoes. This stuff takes time. The public doesn’t like to wait. I’m sure you get frustrated after awhile.
Why? What’s wrong with indirectly creating some press and excitement for yourself? Look, he went onto a website and got the automotive world talking. He’d have to pay a marketing brand millions to generate this kind of chatter.
Whaaaat are you talking about? Car companies are figuring out that most buyers, when happy, stick with a car brand. The name of the game is to get people into your cars as young as possible (see Merc CLA/GLA). Cadillac’s plan is just fine as long as they stick to RWD cars with sporty aspirations and leave the FWD…
Haha ok. As a bean counter who works on new product development, I can assure you I have no say in who is and isn’t let go. I can tell you that I run cost and revenue models for management so they can make decisions.
Bean counters don’t redesign anything. Bean counters look at the whole picture and report as such. Management looks at margins and challenge. Engineers come back and say “Yeah, we could use plastic here and there. It’ll save us 15%.” Management says make it so. Stupid buying public keeps buy so management doesn’t see…
God would I give both nuts to have one of these...
Beyond that, how is there an argument against mark to market? Businesses have to value their assets based on lower of cost or market. Why should banking be any different?
I cannot believe people believe this. Mark to market is non-issue unless there is massive devaluation. The housing market didn’t devalue itself. It was perpetuated by the collapse of the mortgage backed securities market and the realization that home values were propped up on nothing. Banks weren’t surviving the first…
HA HA HA... widely accepted. By who, Jamie Diamond? My friend, there were many, many facets to the “Great Recession” beyond those who couldn’t pay their bills. But it’s pretty much fact that deregulation of banking and investing was the main culprit. Were people not paying their bills the ignition? Yes. But the bomb…