JoelRubin
Joel Rubin
JoelRubin

It's the last shot that made me raise an eyebrow—of the old man. It was not that blurry and muted looking when I played it. I can understand more crisp lines and higher-definition, but that much difference in contrast and saturation seems a bit fishy.

Hacking your own brain?

So I'm guessing for the 1080 shots, they plugged the PS3 output directly into a computer. While it looks like for the original shots, they found the crappiest LCD screen they could and took a picture of the screen with a camera.

Four adults and three kids fed for $15. That's literally the only reason I go.

A breach of contract is a breach of contract. Paying for a service, then demanding your money when you don't get that service is not frivolous, but not doing so makes you a sucker. What, are they going to "learn their lesson"?

Yes, I agree not paying for a game is bullshit. But here's the thing: If they couldn't crack a game, would they immediately go out and buy it, or would they just move on? They'd just move on.

1) Blizzard really looks like they're suffering, and dearly need protection from pirates. I mean, they're practically going bankrupt!

That would be a better option than "Restart to Replay", as it would simply require internet to start the game, not in the middle—but it would still be a shoddy workaround and not what people are asking for.

And if not all players can get online?

"limited access, restricted access, loss of property" all apply, especially if real-world money is involved.

So everyone has exactly the same sleep schedule in your world? Everyone goes to bed at exactly midnight and wakes up at exactly six AM?

Damn. This is one of the reasons I dislike going shopping with my wife. I'm not in a wheelchair, nor blind, but I've very wide shoulders (if I stand in a 30" doorframe, my elbows touch the sides)—I can't even walk down the aisles of most stores without turning completely sideways. It makes me feel uncomfortable and

OM NOM NOM NOM NOM

I thought "furry" meant the people who fap off to porn of anthropomorphic characters, not the characters themselves.

Wow, I'm so glad you list the source of this video so I can go and watch the whole thing.

Yeah, it was that DreamBuildPlay (or whatever) vid from 2009, I can't remember where I saw it. But I said "fox/bunny type dude in wide brim hat and flowing robe-like clothing, side-scrolling and twirling a weapon to battle enemies", and everyone just looked at me like I'd been eating mushrooms.

Also for the fact that, unlike cartridges, every disc reader on the planet will still read CDs, and they will until a total format change. It's ultimately about precedent for me—I don't think it's ridiculous that a company take a half a percent of profit to ensure continued use of software, even on newer platforms. I

I sell military surplus for a living. That ACU fabric (65/35 NyCo rip-stop) might be breathable, but flexible it's not. I don't need to read your cursory description when I can cite you the Nato Stock Number for the damn things. They're designed for hot weather, long hikes, and the Multicam camo is designed to hide in

No, it didn't save them any appreciable amount of money. Link clarifies that.