The Catholic Church is not intolerant of anyone. Disagreeing with people's opinions regarding the propriety of certain conduct does not equal intolerance.

"Terrible organization" that provides charity to more people in need than any other organization on Earth.

Well, there are restrictions on one conjoined twin killing the other, so I guess they are.

There are conjoined twins in which one twin is neither self sufficient nor deemed parasitic. They exist.

The point of the conjoined twin analogy is to show that the physical viability test used to determine personhood is flawed.

I'm sorry if you don't like this answer, but it's not forced if you voluntarily put yourself in that position.

So being "inside of" instead of "attached to" makes all the difference?

You win. If you get pregnant because the condom broke, it means you were forced into pregnancy.

It's only legal with the consent of both parties involved. There are absolutely restrictions on one conjoined twin forcing the seperation (or destruction) of the other twin.

Rape is an obvious exception. The rest of your points are ridiculous.

Don't conjoined twins, some of whom are men, have to do the same thing?

So a conjoined twin who wouldn't survive a seperation doesn't need the another person's body to survive?

So you want to use phycial viability as the test of personhood when you agree with the outcome, but not when you disagree with it?

Conjoined twins who can't survive on their own aren't people either then. I'm sure they would be to differ.

The issue is not whether anyone can be forced into pregnancy. Nobody's forced into pregnancy regardless of whether abortion is legal for 12 weeks or 9 months.

So you're saying it doesn't matter when the fetus becomes a person— that a women has a right to kill another person if that other person is reliant on her body?

I’m sorry, but I’m just not seeing how this is a women’s rights issue. Every reasonable person agrees that anybody, male or female, may remove a benign growth from his or her body. Every reasonable person agrees that nobody, male or female, may kill another person. Isn’t the question then at what point a fetus becomes…

Didn't he agree to Boeheim's terms when he agreed to the interview?

He's got a point about Kyrie Irving though.

Boeheim said he would partake in an interview only if no questions were asked about Bernie Fine. When Katz then agreed to conduct the interview, his acceptance of Boeheim's terms was implied. It doesn't matter whether or not he specifically said he agreed.