I think it's important to note what you love Steam for.

Here is a good description of it:

Yeah it's hard to capture the heart of the actual gameplay in a non-interactive medium, you know. I thought it was clear that it implied that it captured the heart of the story and the "feel".

Latin and Greek (be it ancient Greek or modern Greek) have nothing in common really.

In which way is it outdated?

Italian as a modern-day version of Latin is actually the guide to how it would have been pronounced in "ancient italian", i.e. Latin.

I wonder what happened to the times when designing a new console meant thinking about how to please the gamers. Pleasing the businesses is fine as long as the main focus is on the actual consumers, but it seems like the Xbox One has been designed from the ground up to please the businesses and with the gamers as only…

It captures the heart of the game's story.

There's still Oculus Rift...

Once they got a publishing contract, they aren't indie anymore, and therefore shouldn't be subject to the same indie conditions.

All cameras have shutters, but some cameras may have "electronic" instead of actual mechanical shutters.

35mm seems pretty perfect for street photography.

I guess the player controlled character in this shot is Kirk. The player character sometimes has some different rendering path in a game engine, since he's "special". Usually, with correct Z buffering, this wouldn't be a problem, but I guess they somehow have a bug there with correct Z rendering.

I think he is supposed to be closer to the camera than Kirk. I.e. the render order and Z buffering is all wrong, Kirk is being rendered on top of Spock despite being behind him.

That's why I found Yuri from Tales of Vesperia so refreshing... not some stupid brat, and not even one who actually wants people to follow him.

The problem for developers having a contract with a publisher is that sometimes the royalties or the amount of money you get paid for developing that game are based on how well the game does in terms of a MetaCritic score. That's often in the publishing contract. That's pretty stupid in my opinion.

"Liberal" by itself doesn't say anything.

Just as with the slippery slope argument on homosexuality, I don't think that anything that has such a huge lobby will be ever in danger of slippery slope.

Duh, that would require a time machine!

Sexual orientation is tied a lot into other things though, so it will be near implssible to change sexual orientation without f*ing up everything else about your personality.