Stupid grammar point: She’s a widow, he’s a widower.

Re: “That said, sometimes she refers to me as her “daughter” or “step-daughter”

Interestingly, historically the term in-law meant any relative in law but not in blood so she would be M-I-L. If you’re ever doing genealogy research and see “son-in-law” that might be a step child or an adoption, not necessarily the daughter’s husband.

On the other hand if having a prenup was standard then there would be a standard prenup and any variation on that standard would be met with “Why? Don’t you believe in our marriage?” The existing “no prenup” is the same as an existing “standard prenup” without the lawyers.

Title, license, insurance: No, but driving the car for a year does show that it was a personal asset.

Yes, if your labor wasn’t free you would have to pay income tax on it anyway so it’s a wash. If you only do that once or twice a year you can probably avoid paying SE taxes on it (sporadic activity) but you should ask a CPA. If you end up having to pay SE that hits pretty hard.

Re: “Put your presentation’s important information in the first minute to grab your audience’s attention.”

Last forever? I don’t think I’ve ever had a threader last through 3 uses.

Don’t know. It’s been over a decade since I was last required to look at one. But even so I recall questions similar to: “You find out that your friend’s wife is cheating on him, would you: Tell your friend OR not tell your friend” And the answer is: I would talk to the wife.

RE: “or it could be that the person truly doesn’t know...”

Because we haven’t. A hundred years ago we had adequate public schools that gave about 8 years of education, mostly rote mathematics, history, and grammar. And now, we have adequate public schools that give about 12 years of education and add science and social studies to the curriculum.

@BadassNoor: Re: “Kids need to be compared..know where they can improve...”

Dictionary attacks only work for chosen passwords, the cartoon assumes that you use 4 randomly selected words, thus a dictionary attack is irrelevant.

The article presupposes that you should eat special recovery food in the first place. Most people I see do use the Powerbar as an extra food, not a meal replacement. They run for 45 minutes, eat their powerbar and then go have their regular meal. They do this, I think, for a couple of reasons, but primarily because…

If people are eating an EXTRA meal after a workout then it is the wrong kind of meal. It doesn't matter if they eat grilled chicken or peanut butter or taco bell. Eating taco bell for lunch is better than eating some grilled chicken for recovery and then having taco bell for lunch. Yes, eating the chicken for lunch…

The thing is, it isn't a mistake. The mistake is in thinking that you need to eat something EXTRA after you work out. Just eat your next normal meal and you'll be fine.

I think the real implication is that the idea of "recovery food" is complete BS. Just eat your next meal and be done with it.

Re: "by repeat #3 or 4 I'm ready to quit"

I've noticed at my local store that prints coupons at the register that if you use a buy 2 get $1.00 off then it will print you one that is buy 3 get $1.00 and if you use that one you get buy 4 get $1.00 off. They are clearly trying to find the smallest coupon that keeps you coming to the store.

Not according to the EPA (http://www.epa.gov/agriculture/to…) which states: "Pesticides derived from natural sources (such as biological pesticides) may be used in producing organically grown food."