I like the Dr. Seuss one because it actually sounds like Dr. Seuss, unlike every other Dr. Seuss pastiche I've ever seen. People get too hung up on the rhyming and neglect the rhythm.

The fact that this is going to be featuring Andy from Parks and Rec and Kirk from Gilmore Girls is making this my favorite Marvel movie.

And here I was reading that article about American jobs being taken by computers and chuckling. "I work with dogs," I said. "My job is safe," I said...

I always forget that that newer version of The Twilight Zone exists. Unless "Cradle of Darkness" is a classic TZ episode whose twist is that Katherine Heigl is actually a time traveler in real life.

I suppose we'd still call it the Moon. It'd be like Stonehenge, which isn't technically a henge even though the word "henge" comes from the name Stonehenge!

The important thing about this article is that it reminded me that Zoobooks exist. Man, Zoobooks were the shit in elementary school.

Every time I look at this picture, "Stayin' Alive" starts playing in my mind.

I guess there's nothing to do but wait for the Netflix revival seven years later.

Me too! Then I was disappointed when he didn't ask Tony whether or not, if he married Ned Stark and then after Ned died got remarried to Ringo Starr (nee Richard Starkey), that would make him Tony Starkey Stark Stark.

This is just another sad reminder that Happy Endings was canceled.

I GET 0.000623 RESPECT! 0.000623 RESPECT, I TELL YOU!

HUMANS BE PROCESSING INFORMATION LIKE THIS! ROBOTS BE PROCESSING INFORMATION LIKE THAT! AM I RIGHT? YOU KNOW THAT I AM RIGHT!

A Potato Head Eleventh Doctor? Okay, I have to admit that that's pretty abnosome.

Vin Diesel is diving back into science fiction movies with a vengeance — with a strange new feature called Soldiers of the Sun.Which is apparently about Orcs that live in Earth, in the future. Ooook.

I honestly think you're not giving people enough credit if you think people didn't start using "literally" incorrect on purpose. When I first started hearing people use it that way, they were clearly doing it as a form of hyperbole. And judging by the responses from some other people here, I'm not the only one.

It's still ignorant. Doing this does not add impact or inflection to an idea or emotion. There are other things in the English language that do that such as simile, metaphor. hyperbole or allegory.

Thanks for pointing out something that I meant to mention and forgot: "Figuratively" is most certainly not the more accurate word and I don't get where that idea came from.

It is not pedantry to suggest that words be used correctly, while, yes, allowing for regional differences, evolution and changing times.

Since when is the ability to say "you're using that word incorrectly" an accurate barometer of intelligence? Pedantry is usually a sign of arrogance more than anything. And what makes you think that American English is fragmenting at an "unnatural" pace and what exactly is the natural pace? (For what it's worth, you…

Why so serious?