JeffJefftyJeff
JeffJefftyJeff
JeffJefftyJeff

I've been wanting this to happen for a while. In fact, for a while I had been looking for evidence that this actually was happening. It'd be the only way to do a multi-Doctor story that hasn't been done before.

They also might, when choosing to live among us incognito, think the name Ford Prefect would be nicely inconspicuous.

Am I the only person who, when reading this article, couldn't help but imagine a young Ron Howard studying primate mating behavior, perhaps to the Andy Griffith theme?

Freddy Vs. Jason
Alien Vs. Predator
Batman Vs. Superman

I think, if you're going to do a movie about Batman and Superman grudgingly working together, this is the title you go with. But considering it's MOS Superman and that they're gonna spend most of the movie fighting against each other instead of, I don't know, be saving people, then maybe "World's Finest" as a title

Yeah, in my imagination, Ackles and Padalecki were both slowly pulling guns to their head as they were explaining the whole "one brother's got a secret" thing for what has to be the hundred and fiftieth time. "And it's interesting because it's about why Sam somehow escaped being dead again BAM!"

Or they might be coffee drinkers.

So does that mean you were a spider already?

So someone who can't taste sweets might also be sterile? Way to kick a guy while he's down, nature!

Only as long as we get the scene where she zaps Bungalow Bill right between the eyes.

This is one of those "Well, duh!" studies where they're trying to answer a question that has an intuitively obvious answer but no data to back it up. And we have a need for these studies. Sometimes (hell, oftentimes) the "common sense" explanation is painfully wrong. But I always wonder if, when they finally do get

Yeah, that was an intense thing to watch. Thirty seconds into it I could hear myself muttering "Okay, turn it back on turn it back on" under my breath.

Orpheus is too developed for this list. He has his own plots and supporting cast and everything. He's not just a guy who says things overly dramatically. I mean, he IS that, but not just that.

I've been coming to io9 for a while now, and I still get a bit tripped up by the format that puts the name of the movie or show after the video or picture example instead of before it. I was just wondering if anyone else has this problem?

Presumably these were all thought to be haunted, until some meddling kids revealed that the ghost was just a guy in a mask searching for treasure.

The point is that "things getting lost" is what happens during transitions. And complaining about it kind of is whinging. They were right about letter writing being a dying art, but was that so bad? Did we lose something vital to the human experience when letter writing died off? It's not as if the written word died

Fair enough, it doesn't happen ALL the time, but it's happened several times and seems to be a recurring pattern in history. We're in one of those periods now, much the same way the authors of these quotes were then. And much like many of today's cultural critics, these authors' quotes are all fatalistic. Each one of

But isn't part of the point that this massive sort of change is going on all the time? That society isn't static but constantly in flux, which leads us to look upon earlier time as a simpler, easier time because it's the one we grew up understanding?

I've come to realize that this is the Superman movie we should have expected from the creative team that gave us a Batman that doesn't "have to save you" and then just decides to quit for ten years. They're clearly not trying to put the definitive versions of DC characters in movies as much as filtering the characters

I love Martin is saying that it won't be a problem if they include everything, immediately after Benioff and Weiss say "Well, there's no way we could include everything."