@Mister Jack: Now available in Diet Jack!: You can't have expert in Versus...

@Kobun: The 2nd paragraph is silly. You can easily say the same about console sales and used sales along with the high development costs because of the devkits and licensing. It is a shame that most see it as an afterthought, but that is only because some have the hopes of that "big" console title which doesn't always…

@resvrgam: I'm not talking about preferences. I'm just suggesting it isn't some uber shit experience to use a controller for an FPS. I used them in the 90s, and early 2000s. I also don't notice the aim-assists on the PC version, Aim-assist has been around forever on consoles.

@resvrgam: I'm not talking about preferences. I'm just suggesting it isn't some uber shit experience to use a controller for an FPS. I used them in the 90s, and early 2000s. I also don't notice the aim-assists on the PC version, Aim-assist has been around forever on consoles.

@Kobun: If it wasn't profitable, they wouldn't even bother with a port...

@RedCarmine: I'd assume they aren't Milk Chocolate (yummy) since Milk is offensive unless it comes from a human teat for PETA members.

@Fernando Jorge: It isn't really farfetched. The President admits herself that sometimes it is best to put them to sleep. They also have tax records of them purchasing walk-in freezers... the type to store cadavers in.

@resvrgam: As much as I dislike using controllers for FPS titles, I wouldn't really call them shitty outright. Most developers however don't optimize their console ports and delay the title for months and then charge a premium for being a delayed port. Some like Ubisoft, even tack on $10 more and then throw horrible…

@WarlordPayne: He'll say "we paid them to the remaining IW members". Funny how it works, yes?

Looks fun for a bit at least. I know some Kotaku reader commented on something like this being done when Mutations were confirmed.

Meh, they aren't in trouble unless the software continues to stagnate. Watch everything spike up with Super Mario Galaxy 2 and whatever else they have coming.

@John-Hamptonshire: The multiplayer thing was announced months ago and that it wouldn't be AC3, obviously it'd be some kind of Side-story thing.

With the problems of SC:C going on and its shoddy multiplayer, I expect the PC version to be delayed and still be riddled with problems. Ubisoft will claim none stem from the DRM though.

@allstaraugustine: The "current" gen that we are in, is the reason for so many trilogies. Many have stated they wanted to do as such because of the high cost of development. Most also wanted to create better experiences by having clear HUDs or no HUD.

@doubtful: I thought it would be something induced from drug recreation, not a natural dream.

@ChromaticMagus With Rainbows: People love being teased for some reason when being voyeuristic I guess. One reason would be that people already devoted so much time to watching it for little nuggets of information and don't want to feel that "devoted time" has gone to waste by stopping their watching of the show.

@Erwin: Indeed, Samuel doesn't really fail. He can do practically any role they give him. He does plenty of VA work so he is always prepared to get into the role.

@Desanvium: I have the exact same opinion as you. Obviously, people blowing away $150+ per month on the newest titles may enjoy this, until they find a time where they can't even find the time to sit down and enjoy the game because servers are bogged or too busy with work.

@rainofwalrus: The choice of actually "buying a game" may not exist at that point if they have people biting subscription models.

@thesircuddles: It sure as hell isn't essential for survival in the PC market as Ubisoft tries to makes it out to be. It is sad to see the Steam forums with people having so many problems with the game and how "dead" the matchmaking service seems to be. The game is already 5 hours and most people that want the…