JRoodPaynrd
JRoodPaynrd
JRoodPaynrd

He represented just being a virtuoso and being anti-establishment. Hate doing this but he was kinda Good Will Hunting of hoops. Genius. Effortless. Troubled. Resented. Resentful.

Also, I was at event with my congressman boss at lbgt center and guy stood up saying that they'd never really achieve political progress until more gay members are elected to which he replied, "I think you'd be surprised to know who, in congress, is actually gay. One, in particular, sticks out who's now a senator.

Okay, no reason to defend him, but worked for congressman with somewhat questionable background who wanted to get a scooter to drive around the district. I was only thing separating him and the obvious judgements. I mean, maybe Schock's staff just didn't have the nerve to clue him into the consequences. I'm reaching

guess I could say same about Jordan but what I'm still nostalgic for the moments he gave me as a kid.

Wish this dude didn't carry the weight of the world on his shoulders. Last sentence of the lede (sorta) the fact that he should mean something to us is rt on. I grew up I'm golden age of Chicago hoops watching MJ bring championships and worshipped Jordan. But I never saw anyone with AIs grit, determination, speed and

I'm a guy and when I was at the Naval Academy I woke up on at least two occasions with female midshipmen in my room undressed on top of me. It was the same person both times and I felt awkward and little freaked out but it's not like I was gonna report it. Honestly, it wasn't a big deal. i could easily get her off of

What's with Alito? I mean, we knew he was gonna be conservative but was there any hint he'd be weird like this?

What can the say about Crawford now?

Thanks for the tip. I'm starting to really get into it and regretting what I've missed out on. Kinda lookin like Hawks are gonna do this tonight. I'm sure we'll be exchanging at the end.

Dude, I'm not blaming you. In a vacuum, your analysis would be okay to me and prob everyone else. But in the larger context of the other Stanley Cup pieces on DS it just feels one-sided. Like going to NYTimes during presidential debates. I come to Ds for the unpredictability of the opinions. That's why feels weird.

Everyone here is talking about how Bruins are just physically beasts. i don't know enough about hockey to have a good opinion but felt like the deadspin coverage was skewed, given the parity in the series score and game scores and OTs.

Fair enough but look at the headlines and you can understand why someone might think as much.

That's so cool. Thank you for that. God, why hasn't another actor photog recreated that? How iconic? Sure, it's a little cheap but amazing.

YES! I'm not the only one who's noticing. Every Stanley Cup post I've seen has been so decidedly pro-Bruins. I hope Chicago wins just to user the authors.

I'm not biggest hockey person in the world but feels like Deadspin is decidedly in the tank for Boston. Thought it was just one author but e looks more widespread than that now.

I remember seeing a news clip of him standing/camping-out in line for the release of the new iPhone or iPad or something. It wasn't a publicity stunt either.

Am I the only person who thinks Woz is the coolest? He seems so completely without pretense. And happy. And normal. Think he dated Kathy Griffin. Can you get more real/cool/self-effacing than that (not knock on Griffin - testament to his realness).

But I feel like you using this particular violent AP photo kinda makes light of the situation? I admit, I wouldn't have been able to resist using it if I were you but you're supposed to be better than me, Jezebel.

The red bandanas?

looks like he's just crossed over the fine line of looking chemically enhanced.