Am I the only one that doesn't have a problem with this quote? Here we have a non-car person actually recognizing something about the driving dynamics of a car...and we shit on them for not knowing the right terms?

Add two extra doors. Throw a Skyactiv diesel in there. Paint it brown.

What you need to know about Ferrari is that they will give their seats to anybody for enough Euros. No questions asked.

I'm actually OK with all of these. Some, like the F12 and S-Class actually look great.

So, the NSA convinced cell phone manufacturers to spend millions installing additional technology in their products that they wouldn't otherwise have installed? Then they convinced network companies to dedicate tons of additional bandwidth specifically for this purpose?

But the NSA didn't force companies to develop and install unnecessary technology, just for the sake of spying. They just gathered data from what was already being sent. Imagine if they had to force every cell phone manufacturer to spend millions installing an additional "Spy transmitter" and then convince every…

You're missing the point. These cars/cameras aren't connected to a network in the first place, and aren't transmitting any data to intercept. The NSA would have to convince all of the manufacturers to install wireless transmitters on all the cars' cameras, and then convince the network companies to dedicate…

True, but the NSA were just intercepting/copying data that was already being sent. I'm saying that they will need to build this technology into the cars in the first place, just for the purpose of spying.

The network/infrastructure to support this would have to be MASSIVE. You're talking country-wide cellular networks that need to be big enough and have enough bandwidth to wirelessly collect and store pictures and video from EVERY CAR on the road.

The worst is constantly stalling because you forgot to take the parking brake off. Did it about 5 times with passengers in the car before I realized my mistake.

People not going to "educate themselves on vehicle control." They are going to drive the way they always do, and crash into things. I would rather every car have these technologies, with the opportunity to turn them all off.

I disagree. Most cars that have DRLs also have automatic headlights that turn on if it's dark enough. Plus, it helps fix the problem of idiots driving around in the rain or dusk, or even at night, without their headlights on.

I hate these because they are massive and pointless, but without a sense of humor. If you daily drive a diesel Super Duty, at least there's some silliness about it. This is just big and wasteful, but without the silliness.

This is the perfect answer. If only we knew then what we know now.

When I first watched the video, I thought that the Cayenne pulled out to make a pass and found the trailer there.

To be fair, having driven tons of base entry-level small sedans, the Camry is one of the best I've driven. That said, the only two I haven't driven are the Mazda3 and Focus.

It's the same with that lawsuit where they had to pay a million to the woman who hit the wrong pedal on an off-ramp. WTF is wrong with these judges?

So, did they actually conceal information from the government?

I know PDK is amazing, but I can't help but feel that certain cars should only be bought with a manual. A PDK 911 makes total sense, but a non-stick Cayman/Boxster just doesn't seem right to me.

Am I the only one impressed with how fast the airbags deployed? The thing had just barely touched the ground.