You’re absolutely right. It’s completely selfish to only want to support the candidate that has had a fantastic track record and runs a (mostly) ethical campaign that doesn’t rely on skeevy tactics to win primaries or the actual election.
You’re absolutely right. It’s completely selfish to only want to support the candidate that has had a fantastic track record and runs a (mostly) ethical campaign that doesn’t rely on skeevy tactics to win primaries or the actual election.
If this ends up being a race between Clinton and Trump or Cruz? I’d say I’d gladly abstain from voting. You made your own bed America, now you have to deal with it. The only worthwhile candidate is Sanders and you’re increasingly trying to push the only reasonable voice out in favor of partisanship. If the world gets…
There was full frontal in GTAIV. My argument was not invalid, you’re just a twit. Enjoy! :)
Wada might have terribly mismanaged the business side of Square-Enix, but if his employee treatment was adequate, he’s more than capable of criticizing a company that doesn’t treat its employees properly, privately or publicly.
No, son. You need to grow up because you’re incapable of change, have you ever heard of the term ‘arrested development?’ Look it up. Fits you guys perfectly. Incapable of seeing how things work, you blame it all on SJWs because “I see it” when you in fact see fuck-all.
Dude, really? Are you really that simple-minded? Do you think SJWs have a greater impact on the industry than the ESRB?
No, because you don’t like to hear the truth that “a few deranged sociopaths” have no impact on a multi-billion dollar industry. If a few deranged sociopaths did have an impact? This entire industry would be all about those eroge games and we’d have 10 sequels to Rapelay already.
No? Do enlighten me as to your inside knowledge behind the reasoning then!
Good thing I wasn’t using it as an insult then.
When Sony had to remove rumble due to their ongoing lawsuit with Immersion tech. did they say “We can’t do this because we’re in a lawsuit”? No.
How could shooting grunts in Halo get it rated ‘M’ but shooting humans in Uncharted get it rated ‘T’?
The ESRB has rated tamer games worse for the simple fact that you could see a bare titty on it. I’m pretty sure a buttslap would ensue an ‘M’ rating on a game. Because the ESRB has inconsistent standards, and it’s cheaper to just edit it out than to send a game in for certification twice, that costs money.
No, that isn’t what Tecmo said. That’s what a Japanese community manager at Tecmo said in broken English. Tecmo’s never officially implied anything, and the fact of the matter is: No one was complaining about DOAX3.
No, I’m not. As someone who has both worked retail and seen its application from a consumer perspective? No one gets carded or has any trouble buying E, E10+ or T rated games. Sell an ‘M’ rated game to a kid under 17 and there’s consequences.
Yes, I do. Because the ESRB has rated games ‘AO’ solely for being able to have mode support for naked ladies. It rated the Halo games, (which show almost cartoonish levels of alien violence) ‘M’ for more than 10 years despite never really warranting it.
The ESRB once gave a casino game an “Adults Only” rating for showing artwork of topless women on the back of its cards, no sex necessary... Just a static shot of a woman’s breast was enough to earn a game an AO rating. And before you go “Oh, but it’s a casino game...” The ESRB usually rates casino games E/E10+ or T.
Getting an M-rating instead of a T.
Uh,or you know... There’s a reasonable argument that doesn’t involve some nonsensical “THIS IS AN EXCUSE! IT’S ALL THE SJWs FAULT!” whining.
Or, y’know “We thought this was a good idea until we realized it might get our game rated M, PEGI-18, etc.” But, y’know... It’s always about dem SJWs. ;)