Oooh! I thought you didn't understand people; you don't understand statistics. You think that the likelihood of a group of reddit creeps aggregating information about you and celebrating masturbating to pictures of you if you post pictures of yourself online is equal to the probability of being his by a car while…

Anyone who owns a car knows that it will likely be stolen. Anyone who relies upon oxygen knows that they are likely to be strangled. Anyone who crosses the street knows they are likely to be hit by a bus. I see it now. I am sorry your insight eluded me.

Your metaphors are not improving. Nor do you appear to understand how attractive nuisance works. You might mean assumption of risk, which is also inapplicable in this situation. Also, nobody is saying this is illegal, just creepy.

Riling up the commentariat should not be done for sport; only to provide food, shelter, and clothing.

1. One does not fight bulls in bull pens.

Yes. It has a very solid cast and the writing is catching up with their talents rapidly. Also, Crews is amazing in it. HI TERRY!

Bingo. Folks don't want to hear about how to be a writer from anyone who wasn't fortunate enough to be wildly successful at it. Realizing this about myself allowed me to refocus on a career in which I wanted to do the necessary work, not just get lots of money, respect, and fame (but not too much, thank you).

If the Bulls ever return to respectability (with Rose or without), Noah will be the reason that there's a salvageable team left to add pieces to.

UPDATE: 0

As a long time Bears fan, I have to correct you: there is no such person as Henry Burris.

As an attorney, I can confirm that using prior language that was effective can save clients a lot of money (or a lot of my time, if I'm in house). However, attorneys are (or should be) embarassed when they crib language that clearly applies to another situation that does not apply to the one at hand (in this case, it…

I thought the point of his Final Jeopardy strategy was to keep the second place contestant (who he'd already "beaten," in that he chose to tie rather than win) in the game for the following day, rather than replacing them with another random contestant (whose abilities were unknown). Am I totally off base on this?

I'm certainly not saying either "accept it" or "quit whining about it." In fact, I think my comment strongly implied that sexism (or some sort of age/gender bias) was the problem. I was only pointing out that the decision probably makes economic sense in light of this existing cultural bias, such that looking to…

Yeah, this likey isn't really wage discrimination. Producers look at movie stars based on how much additional revenue is likely to be generated based on that movie star's being attached to the project. This is entirely divorced from how talented the individual is, regardless of gender. Once again, the culprit…

Ironically, the writer himself begs the question "what responsibility does Marshawn Lynch have to exert control over how he's perceived?"

Which begs the question: why do it?

Because it only generates about 25 words of copy. We need to see more production out of Lynch.

Serious question: How would a union handle the disparate interests of various athletes, particularly between those who are likely to go pro and those who are not?

1989 S13 240sx SE (I don't think this photo is an exact match). Hand me down from my grandfather in 1999, with just over 30K on it. Loved driving that car so much, even amazing on long road trips. Only car I truly miss...

Yes. We generally won't extradite our citizens in situations where the rights guaranteed by the U.S. constitution would be violated as a result thereof.