IncomingPlayer
IncomingPlayer
IncomingPlayer

Contridictory headcanon doesn't make what you're saying canon. It's just that, contridictory heacanon. The Rannoch Reaper believes what all the Reapers believe, but, like Sovereign, implies a complete lack of knowledge as to why it believes that. The Control ending doesn't even help your case, seeing as though it

It's great to try and stutter about, pretending that your comment exists in a wonderful vaccum, seperate from the very thing it's quoting. It's really a case of foot going yet deeper in mouth, but it's funny to watch you try and pretend, because you don't want to admit your massive mistake, that your comment was

Bearing in mind you'd want to frame his post because of how great it was. Because of how much sense it made..

Are you saying "Let's see you do better" and "If you can't do better then it's fine" are the same statements?

Erm no a huge chunk of the entire series was dedicated to showing that the Krogan are so naturally violent that they destroyed themselves with nuclear fire, and the galaxy has no way to sustain them. Curing the genophage is a massive, massive reason to show that you have terrible judgement.

What a terrible, terrible defense. Going out of your way to tell me how it reads? More like going out of your way to completely and utterly fail to read and trying to twist it into what you wanted it to read. Now, with your foot firmly in mouth, you're stuttering about trying to pretend that's what I was trying to

Created the Reapers, who created the Citadel. And perfectly placed as a failsafe? Where about is that said in the series?

You mean the Catalyst who is shown to wield no control over the Citadel, even going as far as needing Keepers to control it?

Are you comparing thinking about how to fix plot holes in a story with developing a game?

Looks like you totally misread then. Any sort of implications you're attempting to pretend were there are in your imagination, just like "if you can't do better then it's fine". Maybe you should learn to read whatever arguments, or heck even ask questions, if you want to look like you've dismissed them.

Check again, no one said "if you can't do better then it's fine" but him.

Who said "If you can't do better then it's fine"? You can't just dismiss an argument you make up and pretend you're dismissing mine.

Saving the Krogan from extinction by dooming the rest of the galaxy to be overrun by them? A massive mistake. Saving the Rachni, a race that almost brought the rest of the galaxy to extinction? Yeah good judgement there. Brokering peace with an genocidal race of AI who refused to compromise, lest they complete their

No access to the Citadel? They had direct access to the Citadel, though the Citadel Relay. They were locked out, it's called "the events that take place before ME1".

Give it a shot then. You've had 3 years to think about it.

Why would entire alien fleets follow the commands of a human who knows nothing about their battle tactics, especially if a wrong command meant the extinction of their entire race? Also, how WOULD a wrong command mean the extiction of their entire race? Also, what possible tactics could be used against the Reapers at

It's been almost 3 years, lets hear your fix that takes into consideration the theme of Mass Effect: hard choices with morally grey consequences.

So you're saying that some cards in a game, and not apologising for not raping someone, is evidence that he raped someone?

"The products of his mind do not reflect the inner workings of his brain?"

So he's accused of rape, points out that he didn't even sleep with this girl, and he's being criticised for not "opening a discussion with the public"? Or not apologising to her for.. not raping her? Or not apologising for being accused of raping her?