So? If you don't want that content don't buy it. If you want that content, pre-order it.

"There's babies now?"

I'm so glad they added this character in. I was really hoping for her to be playable.

So you visited your girlfriend and she had a dream she was you visiting herself 50 years in the future?

So you wont remember this comment, humans have a way of remembering negativity, but I really enjoyed this article and I too love Mass Effect. This was quite a personal thing for you to do, so yeah praise all round from me.

What does "I thought this was Kotaku" mean? You said you think this place is bad, and you think this article is bad, so what does that statement mean?

You make it sound like we thought computers like this were good back then.

1st. They say she was captured and experimented on, but they don't say she was killed.

No idea what you're saying.

I think what people are forgetting over this whole issue is that people didn't really criticise Nintendo for not including gay relationships (if you look at the petition it's quite civil and came about because of that glitch) people started criticising Nintendo when they responded to it by saying they didn't want to…

Agreed.

Then why don't you just stop reading them?

What's starting to get old?

I'll have to agree with Metagross and Swampert—and to throw my own picks in here...well, I basically have two lists. My "watch the world burn" list includes Ludicolo (because he's a ridiculous party Pokemon), Slaking (because that would be hilarious), Nosepass, Wailord (plz make him even bigger), Spinda, and Luvdisc.…

Nah a lot of the movies they review aren't bad, it's just their tagline is "No movie is without sin".. Sometimes they miss the mark on their reviews (their Catching Fire one was terrible for example, and they failed to understand what a paradox was in the Harry Potter 3 one) but generally they hit the mark (their…

The first two sins in that video alone are "Monkey symbolism" and "Heights".

"No movie is without sin".

No you, like Mike Fahey, are missing the point. CinemaSins don't review movies because they're "bad", and sins don't have any value. They actually say that "Our sins are meaningless, they have no value".

Literally nothing you said there contradicted what I've been saying.

I don't think it's me that's failing to understand the contract seeing as though I'm simply repeating what we know (Marvel can't get the rights back unless Sony doesn't make movies) and because Marvel still hasn't bought them back.